Pakistan: myths and consequences

I wrote something for Pragati this week about Pakistani creation myths and their consequences. 

I had written a last paragraph that had to be cut due to word limitations, but I am reproducing it here:

The argument is not that Pakistan exists in some parallel dimension where economic and political factors that operate in the rest of the world play no role. But rather that the usual problems of twenty-first century post-colonial countries (problems that may prove overwhelming even where Islamism plays no role) are made significantly worse by the imposition upon them of a flawed and dangerous “Paknationalist-Islamic” framework. Without that framework Pakistan would still be a third world country facing immense challenges. But with this framework we are either committed to ideologies that further undermine existing cultural strengths, sharpen existing religious divisions (including the Shia-Sunni division) and most important, do not have any blueprint for actually running a modern state. Or we are condemned to hypocritically mouthing meaningless and even destructive Paknationalist and Islamist slogans while actually trying to do something else. Damned if we do and damned when we don’t even mean to do it.
History was old and rusted, it was a machine nobody had plugged in for thousands of years, and here all of a sudden it was being asked for maximum output. Nobody was surprised that there were accidents… (Salman Rushdie, Shame)

Share

War on vaccination continues..

This time they came to the village and tied up and beat up ppl who had let their kids be vaccinated. Fined them and collected the money. “The authorities” naturally arrived after they had left.

Code Pink need not worry though. No drones were used.

Fact is fast approaching fiction. 

these were not monsters, these were men, trained cadres, these men who fought with their hearts, who have families, who have children, who are filled with love–that they had this strength, the strength to do that. If I had ten divisions of those men, then our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have men who are moral and at the same time were able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling, without passion, without judgment–without judgment. Because it’s judgment that defeats us.

That story no longer looks as impossible as it did in Coppola’s movie.

Previous exploits of Imran Khan’s misguided brothers are discussed here.

Share

Shame at 30

Rushdie’s great novel will turn 30 soon! Shame is definitely Rushdie’s most underrated novel. I am a huge Mohammed Hanif fan, but obviously no one has written anything about Pakistan that approaches Shame. Great review by Shaheryar Fazli

Excerpts from the review:

Salman Rushdie’s third novel, Shame, which will turn thirty next year, may have an unenviable legacy. Squeezed between its author’s two most famous books – and two of the most famous books of the 1980s –Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses, it is seldom given its due in discussions either of the author’s body of work, or of the direction of Pakistani fiction. Yet, even with the recent ‘boom’ in Pakistan’s literature, it remains the most ambitious English-language novel about that country, yet to be surpassed in terms of scope, inventiveness and humor.

…In the simplest terms, the novel is about the transformation of a country’s identity, the rise and fall of two men who try to control the process, and the tragic outcomes of their missions. Its raw material is Pakistani history. At first glance, Shame’s oft-quoted description of Pakistan as “a failure of the dreaming mind” seems mischievous and intended to provoke. But the failed dream here is an oppressive one: it is the dream of Urdu-speaking migrants who, after Partition in 1947, had to govern an essentially foreign nation, feeling compelled to impose a neat formula – Mohammed Ali Jinnah’s ‘one nation, one culture, one language’ – onto a diverse, unwieldy polity. The dream disappoints because the country is too multi-ethnic, too multi-lingual, in a word too multidimensional for the imposition.

Meanwhile, insurgency and brutal military suppression continue in Balochistan, the army continues to interfere in politics, and Islamization has proven very tough to reverse. If Shame’s political substance makes it relevant reading today, its language, inventiveness and storytelling force will ensure its importance as a literary work even if – fingers crossed – those issues stop being current.

Despite coming under 300 pages, Shame is a big novel that goes for big ideas, about the individual and power, about state force and its limitations, about the imagination under authoritarian rule. It’s also a kaleidoscope, the broadest and liveliest yet, of this country’s complicated personality, full of pettiness and corruption and tragedy, but also rebellion and defiance and wit.

Given the great energy in Pakistani writing today, it would be hasty to say that the trail for the Great Pakistani Novel has gone cold. The 21st Century books mentioned earlier explore such diverse themes as political violence, conspiracy, bureaucracy, class divide, gender roles, army rule, tribal code, city life – proving how rich the material is. It’s possible that another big book that tries to encompass all of it is already in the works, and this possibility, this feeling that the Pakistani novel is still on the rise, is what makes this period in the nation’s literature so exciting.

But in the meanwhile, if searching for such a book, search no further than Shame.

 

Share

Shia Genocide..and a word about native informants

Shia killing continues apace in Pakistan. This time they blew the front off an entire apartment building (also killing 18 Sunnis in the process). Unfortunately, there is going to be more before this madness ends. The killers are very determined. And they may even be ready to take the long view if the army asks them to slow down for a few months. This sounds pessimistic..and I guess it is. But one does not have to be privy to state secrets to know this. The sipah e sahaba is not just an instrument of RAW, MOSSAD and the ILLUMINATI. It has a real presence (perhaps less visible to the super-elite and left wing “native informants” like Sadia Toor and Humera Iqtidar?).

A word about left wing native informants. I know there are native informants galore and I have been accused of being one myself, but I could not find (in a 2 minute google search) any article that sheds light on left wing native informants. Someone must have written something about the various Western educated member of the South Asian native elite who help to translate the affairs of the natives into the language of the modern Western Left. Can someone help find a good write-up?

Back to Shia-hatred.This is Haq Nawaz Jhangvi’s son. Yes, the same haq nawaz after whom the Laskhar e Jhangvi (LEJ) is named. Continue reading

Share

Satyajit’s Ray “The Chess Players”

The one full feature film that the great Bengali director Satyajit Ray made in Urdu/English was “Shatranj Ke Khilari”. The movie is loosely inspired from a short satirical story by Premchand about the “Annexation of Awadh” in which 2 Awadhi Nawabs get so addicted to playing chess that they lose all interest in the affairs of the state and keep playing while the British complete the takeover of the state.

Although Ray is more known for the Bengali movies he made earlier in his career eg the Apu Trilogy, Charulata, Ghare-Baire, this particular movie remains the one which is easiest to appreciate for Non-Bengali people. Its also very different from the rest of Ray’s movies in terms of subject matter. His other work focuses narrowly, highlighting the individual and the emotional interplay between a few characters coming to terms with the changes around them. This one focuses more evenly on the actual changing world as well as the characters involved.

Most of the screenplay is in Urdu and was written by someone else but there are 2 parts which are in English and were written by Ray himself. These are the parts which in my opinion which really tower above the rest of the movie. Ray was an ambidextrous personality who in addition to making movies, wrote his own screenplays, composed his own original soundtracks, wrote delightful short stories and detective novels for children among other things.

Here is the first of these scenes in which General Outram (played by Richard Attenborough who later made the Oscar winning film Gandhi), the resident at Lucknow, has a conversation with his ADC about Nawab Wajid Ali Shah. The atmosphere, the sets, the dialogue and the acting are all so bloody realistic that one forgets one is watching  a movie.The scene highlights the clash of cultures in extreme yet subtle contrast. The hard nosed, business-minded and professional British versus the soft, feminine, decadent yet culturally sophisticated Indians.

And here’s the second. Outram has a conversation with a British Doctor about the legal and practical challenges regarding the Company’s takeover of Awadh.

Start from the 2.05 minute mark.

Share

Pankaj Mishra’s tendentious little book

Postscript: I just reread some of this and it truly is disjointed and repetitive. I am not going to fix it now, but please do keep in mind, that it’s a rolling review, just random comments dashed off as i read the book. That is why its so repetitive and disjointed..(making excuses, yes, I know..)

September 23rd

After being told that everyone from Orhan Pamuk to Pakistani Ambassador (and liberal feminist Jinnahist icon) Sherry Rahman is in love with Pankaj Mishra’s new book I have finally started reading it.
I have only read 50 pages so far.So I have NOT yet reached the meat of the book. But the intro is starting to set a certain tone. And its not a very encouraging one.
I am not impressed. At all. So Far.

Seeing how little time I am getting and likely to get in the next few days, I know I am not going to be a doing a review soon (eventually I do hope to do one).. But a blog permits other possibilities. One of them is a “rolling review”. So here goes. As I go through the book, I will try whenever possible to get online and say a few words. And when Pankaj surprises me and opens new vistas and enlightens with surprising new insights, I promise to tell you that and change my running score. Honestly.

Continue reading

Share

It takes a village to murder

In a small follow up to Zach’s post on honor-killing. Let’s reiterate something: individuals are responsible for horrendous crimes, and their acts of horror reflect their own choices. But choices don’t occur in a vacuum. Most people are conformist, and deeply reliant upon social networks, and the succor which that provides. Therefore, it is not surprising that Muslim men (and to a lesser extent women), to give one example, go through a “liberal” phase, before reasserting “traditional” values. Why? Because not reaffirming a commitment to those values entails an alienation from family, kith, and kin.

This alienation is not distressing for many people. For example, if my relatives are discomfited by my life choices because of their barbaric superstitions, I don’t hesitate to tell them to fuck off. So it has been, and so it will be. But most people are not willing, or capable, of being so aggressive about asserting their individuality. Social norms matter. If we are truly horrified by acts of barbarism which are commonplace in Muslim communities in the West, then we need to address the root cause. Culture. Legal sanction won’t change the underlying dynamic.

Share

Barbarians on the blog!

Omar says below:

Razib Re Anurag, As someone who once more or less took for granted all that Anurag has written, I have a few observations:

1. These beliefs are integral parts of a certain “elite” Brown worldview that is so normative that it is not even visible AS a worldview. Its not just left wingers. The brown elite, right, left, fascist, all share this view. Since it is also then normative in academia, the usual method of “look it up” also doesn’t help much. So Anurag is not being personally retarded. It’s like saying Newton was retarded because he believed in alchemy. That was the normative view. Everyone believed it. Why wouldnt he?

2. Particular counter-examples mean nothing. They can be set aside and the argument continued with new books about the Congo. The list of actual crimes (as you know better than most of us) is very long. And coming from a more advanced civilization, they are also better documented. A lawyerly argument can easily be sustained for decades (and can be backed up with quotes from hundreds of well respected historians and intellectuals, not just fringe elements).

3. For many of us, somewhat distanced from our traditional religions, its is an almost religious understanding of the history of mankind and of good and evil. Anyone not fully convinced is not just challenging a particular historical fact. He is challenging beliefs that give meaning and structure to our lives (that nothing much changes if you do drop it is irrelevant…..thats not how it feels while you are within the religion).

Continue reading

Share