Specially in Assam where the local populace is against all migrants hindu or Muslims.
And how long can one give people work permit and take away their voting right?
They will have to be given path to naturalization. What about their kids?

Sri Lanka sent back 1960’s over half a million South Indian estate worker brought by the british. Many were 2nd and 3rd gen.

At independence, the Brits did not resolve their statelessness.
The brits did not give the South Indian workers Ceylon citizenship because that would have ended indentured status, and Brit estate owners loosing cheap labor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirima%E2%80%93Shastri_Pact

Doesn’t work unless there is bipartisan support. The implementation is bound to be undermined by both sides showing their own voter base liniency.
Specially in Assam where the local populace is against all migrants hindu or Muslims.
And how long can one give people work permit and take away their voting right?
They will have to be given path to naturalization. What about their kids?

It leads to more question than answers.

The process of stopping vote bank migrants has to be done by better security at borders and if required better prosecution of people engaged in such activities in a transparent manner.

It is obvious to all but the feeble minded that India’s N-weapons are China directed. It would be stupid to develop them for defense from Pakistan.

Whether or not the world sees India as competition to China is a bizarre reason for or against the above.

The world doesnt see Pakistan as competition to anything but a lunatic asylum but its nuclear weapons are clearly India directed.

I think the wider world does not see India as a competitor to China. So its understandable, that the author doesn’t too.I guess the point he is making is India’s weapon naming is arbitrary while Pakistan is more focused.

most likely by uneducated haleems

Sultans on Wings: The Symbolism of Weapon Names in India and Pakistan

“The symbolism of these choices is rather clear: The Pakistan government refers to how the establishment of the country was linked to the historical growth of Islam in South Asia (a growth that partially happened in a violent way). Islamabad is also outspoken in showing that its missiles are primarily aimed at India, having been named after leaders who once invaded it.

Compared to the above, Indian military names are not as aggressive ideologically. None that I am aware of carry the memory of a Hindu monarch that would be known for fighting Muslim rulers. The symbolism would be have been complementary had New Delhi named its missiles after those kings that fought the relevant Islamic conquerors (the ones whose names appear on Pakistani missiles). But that is not the case. India’s sole aircraft carrier, Vikramaditya, was christened after a king, but a one that lived long before Islam was even born.”

How about just giving illegal immigrants a work permit without voting rights? Because they typically vote for the likes of Mamta who encourages further immigration to grow her votebank. In Assam Badruddin Ajmal has emerged as a king maker because of such a vote bank. So long as they are voters, some politicians will be incentivised to pull in greater number of immigrants into the country.

There is no way to successfully identify illegal migrants already in India and make sure they leave the country.

It will be notoriously difficult to repatriate them as no country will take them, keeping them in detention camp if any is bonkers too since it just leads to huge outcry and govt. resources being spent to feed people who could be productive.

If BJP is done making whatever point it wanted to make, they can implement CAA and work on securing borders.

More than that just concentrate on economy if for nothing else them self survival