What is the point of “pointless conversations?” Does it serve any purpose except reinforce stereotypes?

1. Endlessly relitigating the TNT does not change the present, so why bother?

2. Does it help to argue with “randos on the Internet” (I really liked that term thanks Kabir).

3. What about online safety concerns when the line crosses over to bullying like the Jason Arday case.

4. Is the polytheistic flexible mind clearly a winner over the inflexible Abrahamic one?

5. Do we leave happy with enriching conversations, yet empty and angry with meaningless ones?

6. Should someone be a grammar Nazi (thanks Indo) especially when the primary purpose of language is communication?

Even though this thread will not be moderated, request to all to keep conversations civil.