The Elder Race and the English-Speaking Heat

Posted on Categories America, Civilisation, Culture, Geopolitics, Politics, Race, Religion, X.T.MTags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

As I write this from Dublin, waiting to board my connecting flight—I’d nearly missed it in Newark, too absorbed in writing to hear the gate call—I’m struck by how a Euro sign or EU flag can alter one’s sense of place. Technically, I’m still in the British Isles. But culturally—unmistakably—I’m on the Continent. A sensation I never quite feel in England.

It’s a strange feeling, this flicker of European belonging. In the early millennium, I was a passionate Brexiteer—young, angry, seeking change. By the time of the referendum, a decade later, I found myself morally conflicted. I knew the EU was not a good fit but as a Bahá’í, I knew I could never advocate for disunity, of any sort. I abstained. Ironically, Commonwealth citizens could vote, but EU nationals couldn’t—a bit of imperial gatekeeping that deeply irritated my liberal British-Irish friend. (“Why can Indians vote, but not the French?” he asked.)

Today, standing in Europe, I feel the contrast sharply. The Continent is genteel, even decadent, locked into postwar consensus. Meanwhile, the English-speaking world feels like it’s on fire—politically, culturally, psychologically. It’s not just the UK or the US. India, too, belongs to this hot zone of rhetoric and reinvention. Pakistan, by contrast, while elite-driven in English, remains emotionally and socially an Urdu republic.

This heat makes sense. These are frontier civilizations shaped historically by Protestant-Catholic-Puritan clashes, settler anxiety, and the demands of perpetual modernity. By contrast, continental Europe—however unstable electorally—feels post-heroic. Fatigued but calm.

On the flight, I read an article, kindly shared by sbarrkum, on Harvard and the New England ethos. It reminded me how even today, the long-declining WASP caste—what I call the “elder race”—still sets the tone for assimilation. Despite demographic collapse and political eclipse, their cultural grammar remains dominant. Their decline is real, but their afterlife is powerful. Razib has a fantastic article on this that I will link to eventually.

And in the US, assimilation always follows power. Immigrants—Jewish, Irish, Italian, Latino, Asian—are digested into whatever remains of this elite grammar. Even in majority-minority Newark, loud with otherness, you feel the gravitational pull of a decayed patriciate etched into its cityscape—architecture as frozen hierarchy, a silent grammar of power shaped by pale, male hands. Every white ethnic is now a kind of WASP. Harvard—once closed to Jews—is now shaped by them. Trump attacking it for antisemitism is rich with irony.

It raises a broader point: elder races rarely survive demographically. Power saps fertility. But they endure through catalyzation. They seed cultures others adopt. The paradox is this: what power cannot reproduce biologically, it sustains through influence, imitation, and institutional design.

Compare this to America’s artificial geography. States, with a few exceptions like Texas or Virginia, lack deep civilizational memory. The straight lines of US states speak to imperial abstraction, not lived regionalism. And that’s why independence movements thrive in places like Scotland or Catalonia but remain impossible in, say, Ohio.

Still, America remains a contest of cultural forms. The genius of African-American and Indigenous resistance lies in their refusal to be assimilated entirely. They offer alternative aesthetics, values, and histories. They complicate the elder race’s digestion machine.

So here’s the provocation: the English-speaking world is hot because it is reacting to the loss of monopoly—not just of capital or empire, but of meaning. Europe is cool because it already surrendered. But in that surrender lies peace.

And maybe that’s why I keep writing these posts. Because something about airports, borders, and in-between spaces triggers reflection. And because maybe, just maybe, Brown Pundits is less a blog than a drifting letter archive—channeling the ghosts of FitzGerald, Gibbon, and the nomads who wrote best on the move.

— X.T.M

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Honey Singh
Honey Singh
13 days ago

@X.T.M – If you are someone who lives in London and visit the NYC area often you will have noticed the rise of Indian “fine dining”.

There has been a wave in the UK and US recently as well as back in India, UAE and Bangkok/Hong Kong.

One of the things that happens when a country gets rich is that it’s soft power increases – an aspect of which is the country’s cuisine becomes more “highbrow”.

It happened with Japanese and Korean cuisine. And now happening with Indian (Chinese and Thai as well).

I think my first post will be on this phenomenon plus photos/reviews of the ones I have visited both inside and outside India and interesting courses/meals I had.

Honey Singh
Honey Singh
13 days ago
Reply to  X.T.M

NYC yeah not as big as London. I have just heard about Semma and Dhamaka and that entire group.

I haven’t tried those.

I have tried the Indian ones (Masque, Bombay Canteen) and the ones in Bangkok (Gaggan, Gaa) etc.

Dubai is also really good apparently (has the 3 Michelin star Tresind Studio). Dubai and UK make sense cause of the Indian population.

Last edited 13 days ago by Honey Singh
Daves
Daves
12 days ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Semma is great, I’m not one to splurge too often on these fancier restaurants but the point is that such places have mushroomed lately. All over the place. As an Indian expat in NJ/NYC for 3 decades, I can see how the food scene has matured and developed exponentially, over the last few years. London to be fair, was ahead of the curve on this. At least based on my few visits.

Daves
Daves
12 days ago
Reply to  X.T.M

yeah Dubai does seem to have great food. It was depressing to me as an ‘American’ that I ate better Indian food in Bangkok than I did in NJ/NY. This was as of 2013 and things have gotten better since then, but ‘miles and miles to go’.

Honey Singh
Honey Singh
12 days ago
Reply to  Daves

Where did you go? Gaggan?

Daves
Daves
11 days ago
Reply to  Honey Singh

Don’t remember, it was a while back, but just some ‘well-reviewed’ restaurant that was near ‘Asoka’ or whatever that centrally located neighborhood I was staying in. Wasn’t that ‘big’ a restaurant, just a humble one, upstairs in a mini-mall type setup. But the food was excellent. Especially when compared to then, US standards. And NJ/NYC isn’t really the mid-west or some place with low diaspora presence…

Daves
Daves
12 days ago
Reply to  X.T.M

checked out their menu, will try it out this summer…

Daves
Daves
12 days ago
Reply to  Honey Singh

its because its ‘native’ market has gotten rich enough to support more expensive dining venues. Like you said its a systemic iteration seen with other ethnicities.

Honey Singh
Honey Singh
12 days ago
Reply to  Daves

Yup.

And that contributes to the entire “system” tbh, not just diners with disposable income.

More culinary institutes are propping up as it is a viable career option now so more kids are getting training too.

The good thing is now these restaurants are becoming even more niche focusing on specific regional cuisines or gimmicks compared to the first wave of “pan-Indian” restaurants.

Honey Singh
Honey Singh
12 days ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Yeah plus a huge Latino population in the border states anyway.

I had once gone to Coachella. That town was completely Hispanic.

Honey Singh
Honey Singh
12 days ago

One more thing I have realized is how White Americans and by extension Americans have turned the United Kingdom as the “motherland”.

Shakespeare and Dickens are taught in American high schools. American authors write books about King Arthur.

Fantasy novels written by American authors are very much in the Tolkienish school of “knights and dragons and elves and dwarves” etc.

Of course that cultural osmosis still exists with regards to music, movies, literature even now.

Nivedita
Nivedita
12 days ago

It’s the unraveling of the Great American dream through the eyes of the White settler.
I personally see it as a tragedy for a country ( the first superpower of the 20th century, no less) to have hit it’s zenith in the 60’s and 70’s then unraveling and rapidly falling off the cliff in less than 60 years.

One reason is that they do lack civilizational heft unlike the old world. Which even in it’s surrender recognises that nothing is permanent but change.

sbarrkum
sbarrkum
12 days ago
Reply to  Nivedita

It’s the unraveling of the Great American dream through the eyes of the White settler.

If you look at the economic numbers, one realizes there is no hope. It is too late. The US has been living and waging war on debt.
Trump is the only one who has spoken publicly and recognized the elephant in the room. However, I do not see his policies making any big dent in the debt pr deficit.

Shakespeare and Dickens are taught in American high schools. American authors write books about King Arthur.

Maybe my generation (I am 66) and even then those who attended elite private schools,

The modern generation of the Average American (earning below 70K/year) are clueless about Shakespeare or Tolkien. Not even Harry Potter.

Heck, I used ask African American undergrad students* what they thought of Jimmy Hendrix.. They were vague, a white musician was the best answer.

I used to teach a few science undergrad courses while I was a grad student in the mid 90’s

Last edited 12 days ago by sbarrkum
Daves
Daves
11 days ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

Extrapolating from anecdotes about ‘African American students’ is…..silly.

Its fashionable amongst desis, and even Europeans to deride Americans about no ‘culture’ etc. I’d say such drinking of one’s own koolaid is …self-defeating.

sbarrkum
sbarrkum
11 days ago
Reply to  Daves

I am extrapolating from my interactions with all classes and types I interacted in the US.

I had fellow grad student friends, erudite and well read
I had alcoholic white red neck friends (I too was an alcoholic).
I had and still friends who grew up in the ghetto (South Bronx and Harlem)
Mostly white Wall Street chaps who were very very smart.but not read well read in the classics.

Then my partner of 20 years. White Irish American heritage, and a masters in English Literature and absolutely loves the classics including Shakespeare . Her son who (now 30) attended a Private school. Absolutely clueless about Literature . Same goes with his classmates with whom I interacted when I lived with them in the US. What they know are video games of which I am clueless.

Its fashionable amongst desis, and even Europeans to deride Americans

Not deriding, commenting, There is no advantage in knowing English Literature or English. Its just a “show off” thing but even that only if moving with literary types. Old generation (mine) “achievement” to brag about and drop quotes.

This whole English thing is just a colonial hangover, specially among South Asians.

The Chinese, Japanese and Koreans have beaten the Anglo Saxons without learning English Literature

Grow up Daves the times are not a changing, they have CHANGED

Daves
Daves
11 days ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

Sorry, I’m not sure what your point is.

Daves
Daves
11 days ago
Reply to  Nivedita

It was a decision by their elites to double down on Chinese manufacturing. They deluded themselves into thinking that they are ‘only’ outsourcing low-end work but will keep ‘innovation’ state-side. When in fact, innovation always is a function of iterative improvements on the factory floor.

America defeated the USSR with its capitalist, industrialist heft, declared victory, and then proceeded to surrender its own systemic advantages to the Chinese communists. Its….ironic really.

Nivedita
Nivedita
11 days ago
Reply to  Daves

Yes, couldn’t have said it better myself…now it’s a path of no return unfortunately…

Compounding this: their basic education system is in a mess as is the healthcare system. Combine this with the other faultlines that have increasingly become apparent over the last few decades and there’s no coming back from that.

Daves
Daves
11 days ago
Reply to  Nivedita

I wouldn’t go that far. USA has inherent geographic advantages that almost assure competitiveness. Energy, food, water independence are non-trivial advantages. Unless they fall hopelessly behind in tech, they are ‘built’ to perpetually retain a competitive shot. That’s what manifest destiny and taking over an entire continent buys you.

Arc of history is predictable however, most ‘nations’ develop, get rich, then get fatter and lazier with successive generations, ultimately being ‘conquered’ in some fashion. Obviously 21st century ‘conquest’ looks different, but just like ‘golden bird’ India was conquered and looted successively by marauders from the Northwest, it could well be Amreeki qismat to end up as one of those grossly overfed grotesquely overweight Holstein cows in American dairy farms. Those mini-van sized heifers on stilts for legs that would snap if they attempted to stand up, but get milked to the max daily. This time, the ‘Moguls’ will be transnational corporations billionaires, and mercantilist export-oriented regimes like Nippon, SoKo, the CCP, and others.

sbarrkum
sbarrkum
11 days ago
Reply to  Daves

Unless they (US) fall hopelessly behind in tech, they are ‘built’ to perpetually retain a competitive shot.

I think you have not looked at the grim economic statistics

Off the top of my head
Debt: 30+ Trillion
Interest on Debt: Trillion
Budget Deficit: 1.8 Trillion (2024)
Trade Deficit: 140.5 billion (Too much imported)
Defense Budget: 1 Trillion

Moody just downgraded US debt from to Aa1 from Aaa.

They had to, could not ignore as USA sovereign CDS (Credit Default Swaps) were trading wider than China and Greece. I.e. US debt default more likely than China and Greece

I wouldn’t go that far. USA has inherent geographic advantages that almost assure competitiveness. Energy, food, water independence are non-trivial advantages.

A big YES
However, the US has dug itself a huge economic hole among other debilitating factor.

However, to do that they need
a) Austerity (reduce imports and pay down debt)
b) Reduce defense Budget
c) Invest in Manufacture and Self Sufficiency

To do above needs a complete system change and political suicide in the current system.

A little bit of theory from Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph A. Tainter
Tainter logically builds his case that the “Law Of Diminishing Returns” is the root cause of collapse since this law grows more and more impactful as societies increase in complexity to support growing populations. Eventually this cost burden becomes so great and the returns so small that the society collapses. I totally agree with the case he makes that as civilizations are driven toward ever more complexity to support an ever growing population the law of diminishing returns rears its ugly head ever more higher. Even maintenance of existing infrastructure eventually succumbs to this law.

Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph A. Tainter

https://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Complex-Societies-Studies-Archaeology/dp/052138673X/

Last edited 11 days ago by sbarrkum
Nivedita
Nivedita
11 days ago
Reply to  Daves

I think they’re there already. WALL-E immediately came to mind when I read the Holstein cows analogy.

The economically weaker sections (across race) are a walking obesity-heart disease- diabetes-bp disaster. Musk is the megalomaniac billionaire in the picture as is the crafty Zuckerberg. Back to square 1 for them, from the East India Company to homegrown mercantilist mercenaries. With the wheeler-dealer Trump as President what more can go wrong really? As I write this, the two megalomaniacs are on a collision course.

They may have the land, the water and the food but that is not sufficient to prevent social friction and unease.

Tech prowess is definitely on a downslide, but it may take another decade for it to completely backslide to a point of no return. Unless the Deep State decides to arrest the downswing if only for purely selfish reasons of self-preservation. The 2009 Wall Street collapse was just a trailer of how badly things could go wrong.

Brown Pundits
26
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x