The revolution eats her (girl) child

…Rs 66 crore disproportionate
assets case against J Jayalalithaa, N Sasikalaa, J Elavarasi, VN Sudhakaran….convicted for offences punishable under Section 120(B) of the IPC
(criminal conspiracy), 13(1) of the Prevention Corruption Act (criminal
misconduct by public servants) and 109 (abetment)…case was
registered by Tamil Nadu police in 1996, after Subramanian
Swamy moved courts and obtained necessary directions…..

….

 …
They say that the wheels of justice turn slowly (all of 18 years) but
they grind exceedingly fine- no less a fine than 100 crores and a jail
term of four years.
If the Supreme Court does not issue a stay
order (unlikely), Jayalalithaa Jayaram, will lose her status as an
Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) and will be required to dissolve her
cabinet with immediate effect.
…….

….
JJ famously added an “a” to her name on the advice of astrologers (we hope she gets her money back). Sad to say, she was a top-notch student who could have made an
outstanding contribution to society, perhaps as a Mars rocket-woman.
But
she got corrupted by her mentor MG Ramachandran (MGR) and then, in her role as Puratchi
Thalaivi (revolutionary leader of the Dravidas)
chose to make the whole society corrupt. Her rise and fall mirrors that of Lalu Yadav: first, a sub-altern captain in the army of Jay Prakash (JP) Narayan, then, a new-age Krishna for the Yadavas, and now instrumental in his own deep-dive into ignominy.
…….
This is to be expected when happens when you run a state as a personal fiefdom (both the Dravida parties are equally guilty of this). It was really the DMK led scandals that helped bring about the fall of the Congress.

And now all of Tamil Nadu is on fire. Hopefully not too many people will be killing themselves (as well as other people).

Amidst all the smoke and heat, a shout-out to the man who is a perennial thorn to people in power-  Subramaniam Swamy. It was Swami-ji who unearthed the damning letter from the PMO (Manmohan Singh) indicating that MMS knew about Coal-gate. Just as it was his single-handed efforts which ensured that the case against Jayalalitha was registered back in 1996.
…..

A trial court in
Bangalore Saturday held Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa guilty
of amassing assets
disproportionate to known sources of her income
during 1991-96.
Special judge John Michael Cunha pronounced the
order in a special court set up in the central jail at Parapanna
Agrahara in the city’s southern suburb amid tight security. 
 …

Follow the live updates:


5:00 pm: Jayalalithaa has been sentenced to 4 years in jail. She has to pay a fine of Rs 100 crore as well.

4:15 pm: Nearly 20 buses were damaged in stone-pelting in Cuddalore district.
3: 45 pm: Appearing before the court four times,
Jayalalithaa has answered 1,339 questions in closed door hearings during
which she has maintained that the case was “politically motivated” and
“fabricated” at the instance of her rival DMK.

3:30 pm: The
Karnataka government has so far spent Rs 2.86 crore on playing host to
the case, according to documents obtained by an RTI activist. [CNN IBN]



3:20 pm: Violence erupts in Tamil Nadu following the verdict. Traffic halted in many places and a bus has been burnt in Kancheepuram.

3: 05 pm: The verdict was delivered at a makeshift
court in the Parappana Agrahara prison complex in Bangalore where
Jayalalithaa and the other accused were present.



3: 00 pm: The maximum jail term she could face is 7
years, while the minimum is one year. If she is sentenced for less than 3
years, she can apply for bail, else she will be sent to prison.


2: 55 pm: The case was transferred to Bangalore’s
Special Court in 2003 by the Supreme Court on a petition filed by DMK
leader K Anbazhagan who had expressed doubts over conduct of fair trial
with Jayalalithaa as chief minister.



2: 50 pm: Pronouncing the order, special Judge John
Michael Cunha held Jayalalithaa guilty of amassing wealth
disproportionate to known sources of her income under sections 109 and
120 (b) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and 13 of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988, said Special Public Prosecutor G. Bhavani Singh.”The quantum of sentence will be decided by the judge later, which can range from two to seven years,” Singh added.



2:45 pm: According to reports, Jayalalithaa is likely to appoint a partyman as the chief minister of Tamil Nadu.

2: 43 pm: Following this judgement, Jayalalithaa
automatically stands disqualified as an MLA of the Tamil Nadu assembly
and will have to step down as the chief minister immediately.


2: 40 pm: Earlier on Friday, Jayalalithaa’s plea to
postpone the pronouncement of its verdict in the disproportionate assets
case was rejected by the Supreme Court.



2: 35 pm: Her former friend V K Sasikala, V N Sudhakaran and J Illavarasi are the co-accused in the case.


2: 26 pm: The AIADMK chief is accused of obtaining
assets worth almost Rs. 66 crore through dishonest means during her
first tenure as Chief Minister from 1991 to 1996.


2: 22 pm: All the four convicted in the 18-year-old corruption case. Sentencing and quantum of punishment to be made at 3 PM

2: 20 pm: Jayalalithaa is convicted under prevention of corruption act.

AIADMK supporters, police clash 
Earlier,
police in Bangalore had to resort to a lathi-charge to control dozens of
AIADMK supporters who were protesting against the conviction of
Jayalalithaa. Heavy security has been deployed in Bangalore to main
peace and order in the city.

………
The case: The
Rs 66.65-crore assets case dates back to Jayalalithaa’s first term as
the chief minister, from 1991 to 1996. It was filed before a special
court in Chennai in 1997 by the Tamil Nadu’s Department of Vigilance and
Anti Corruption.

The case was transferred to Bangalore’s Special
Court in 2003 by the Supreme Court on a petition filed by DMK leader K
Anbazhagan who had expressed doubts over conduct of fair trial with
Jayalalithaa as chief minister.

Jayalalithaa, who has seen
several ups and downs in her political career, in 2001 too had to quit
as Tamil Nadu chief minister following the Supreme Court declaring null
and void the action of the then Governor Fatima Beevi appointing her as
the chief minister as she had been sentenced to two years rigorous
imprisonment in a corruption case.

Thereafter, O Paneerselvan, a junior minister in her council of ministers, was appointed as the state’s chief minister. However, by 2002, she was cleared of all charges and sworn-in again as the chief minister.

Link: in.news.yahoo.com

….

regards

Geetu n Geeta go for (Oscar) gold

Gayathri “Geetu” Mohandas is a talented actor and director from Kerala (she started acting at the tender age of 5 years opposite superstar Mohanlal). She is married to another hot-shot Malayali director (also producer, cinematographer) Rajeev Ravi.
………


Geetanjali Thapa is an upcoming Nepali actor from Sikkim. She made her debut with Kamal K.M.’s “I.D.” and won the Best Actor award at the Los Angeles Film Festival as well as the
ImagineIndia International Film Festival. After “I.D.”, she has acted in
“Monsoon Shootout” that premiered at Cannes this year.
…..

 
Director Geetu has struck gold with her second film “Liar’s Dice” in 2013. Li-Di has received two National Film Awards including, Best Actress for Geetanjali and Best Cinematography for Rajeev. It is also selected to be India’s official entry for the Best Foreign Language Film for Oscars (Feb 22, 2015). Incidentally, Pakistan’s Oscar entry is also a superb, women-centered film: Dukhtar, by Aafia Nathaniel.
……..
In a remote village, far away from
Delhi, Kamala fails to hear back from her husband for five months. He is
in the city for work, toiling on the constructions sites that have
become the hallmark of the capital’s expansion. When his cell phone is
quiet for some time and when the village elders ask for more patience,
Kamala sets out to find her husband on her own.
 


Taking her 5-year old
daughter Manya and a lamb along for the long journey, she is a lone
woman on a long trek in an unknown territory. She meets Nawazuddin
(Nawazuddin Siddiqui), an army deserter. They are trapped together in
the only available option of a trip to the city. He is a drifter and she
is focused on a spot in the dark.




Nawazuddin and Kamala are both young. The context of their journey
does not allow for romantic interludes. Their culture permits even less.
The distrust among them writes their characters — him a stranger with
rash manners and dubious air and her, a vulnerable woman
given less to
trust than to suspicion of a stranger on the road. Telling the truth
comes secondary to them, both impulses drawn from a deep reservoir of a
desire to survive. 

….
Nawazuddin is a hustler, for he must be, as he sets
up his game of dice cups anywhere, from a train compartment to a busy
street.
Kamla is new to this game of survival. A man’s presence is a
must for her on a journey that is not used to seeing single women in
unfamiliar spaces. She brings a little stash of saved money and
Nawazuddin breaks out his dice cups when he needs a little dough.



Mohandas constructs their relationship in layers of cultural
permissibility and situational necessity. Their human warmth is hidden
inside the tough shells of distrust, suspicion and the fear of the
unknown on a road yet to be traveled. 


At times, the narrative appears
to belong completely to Kamala. As the more vulnerable of the two, with a
young child and a lamb as both responsibilities and emotional cushions,
she is careful, fearful but persistent. She begins the journey wearing
the pristine beauty of the landscape on her face, only to let it
withered away with the brute realities of the conditions away from the
village.



…….

Nawazuddin Siddiqui is a prodigious talent. If for Thapa, it is her
face that becomes the space on which the narrative writes its destiny,
for Siddiqui, it is his body. Limp and weary after an injury and harsh
travel, he is willing to help but on his own terms. He transforms
himself every time he sets up his dice cups, bristling with life as if
he is the instrument and the spectators, mere pawns, the dice that he
plays with. Confident but kind, he expresses as he withholds. When he
stumbles, he learns quickly. With Thapa next to him, we witness a rare
duel of memorable performances.


….
The film moves toward the resolution of finding Kamala’s husband. The
underlying connotation in her husband’s failure to stay in touch with
her is ominous.

Thapa, whose fine performance in I.D. won international
awards, plays the courageous if somewhat recklessly irresponsible Kamla,
a lovely lady from the high Himalayas and mother to the precocious
little Manya (Manya Gupta). It’s been five months since
she heard from her husband and she’s worried. He’s stopped writing and
doesn’t answer his cell phone – something’s wrong.



Dragging little Manya and, absurdly, her pet goat along, she slips
away in the freezing night and starts down a snowy mountain road. The
little party is almost immediately attacked by two passing truck drivers
and Kamla would almost certainly be raped, were it not for the prompt
intervention of a straggly-looking guy who intervenes.



This is Nawazuddin (Siddiqui, who played Faizal Khan in Gangs of Wasseypur and more recently charmed in a supporting role in The Lunchbox.)
He’s virtually unrecognizable with a dirty face and a rag around his
head, looking like a generic freedom fighter who sews up his own wounds
with a borrowed needle and thread. 


There are just too few cues (outside
the press book) to realize he’s an army deserter from the Border Guard,
and for most non-Indian viewers he will pass as some eccentric outcast
of society. As long as he’s gruff and silent, he seems like a strong
protector for the two women; but when he finds his voice a few scenes
along, surprise: it’s to whine for money.
Kamla shows no desire for his
company at all, but without him they can’t sneak their little goat on a
bus that takes them to the regional capital of Shimla.



Not much is seen of this exotic location, apart from a scary
night-time scene in which Kamla meets a woman from her village who
evasively refuses to give her info. Sensing a trap, she backs out and
agrees to give their “protector” her gold bangle if he’ll accompany them
to Delhi and check around the construction sites.



The talented actors – including wide-eyed, outgoing little Manya –
are interesting to watch as they struggle with their characters. Kamla
however seems too focused on her quest, to the point of sometimes
forgetting the young child at her side who she dragged into danger, and
her inability to accept the inevitable makes her seem a bit soft-headed.




Rajeev Ravi’s sensitive cinematography smooths out
the rough edges and highlights the film’s transition from the pristine
snowy village with its steep streets to the urban squalor of Delhi’s
alleyways. John Bosters’ music is soulful and low-key.

Venue: Mumbai Film Festival (India Gold), May 18, 2013.
Production companies: Jar Pictures in association with Unplugged
Cast: Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Geetanjali Thapa, Manya Gupta
Director: Geetu MohandasScreenwriter: Geeta Mohandas
Producers: Alan McAlex, Ajay G. RAi
Director of photography: Rajeev Favi

Production designer: Prakash Moorthy
Editor: B. Ajithkumar
Music: John Bosters
No rating, 104 minutes.

….

Link (1): hollywoodreporter.com/liars-dice

Link (2): dearcinema.com/liars-dice

….

regards

Network of Death (yes, but….)

….“No god condones this terror. No
grievance justifies these actions. There can be no reasoning, no
negotiation, with this brand of evil….The only language understood by
killers like this is the language of force…..So the United States of
America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle this network of
death”….

….
As the USA declares total war in the Middle East (again) there are no Christians (or neo-cons) hell bent on a crusade, instead it is just the Central Command engaged in a “lawn mowing” operation against deviant Shias (led by Bashar al Assad) and Sunnis (led by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi).

A few (genuine, if non-original) critiques. The #1 coalition “ally” of the USA – the Saudis – behead just as many people as the Caliphate does. They were the prime movers behind 9/11. They keep spreading Salafist poison around the globe, to the extent that some Japanese (!!!) have now joined the islamist brigades. Why not get rid of the head of the snake- the House of Saud?
………
Speaking of allies, is it not possible for Viceroy Richard G Olson (full title: Ambassador of the United States to Pakistan) to ask the revolutionary brothers-in-arms to stop playing games and let their long suffering countrymen move on with their lives? Hundreds have been killed by floods, millions are internally displaced, manufacturing has been paralyzed (lack of electricity).  When is enough, actually, you know, enough?

Finally, many wise people are claiming (and we agree) that Obama is fighting this war to boost his popularity and keep the US Senate out of Republican hands. Already the polls are registering a boost. And that is fair enough..as a limited objective (the soldiers will be back home by Christmas).

However in the long term it appears that there are only two proper options: remain all-in or steadily pull-out. Either the Central Command is dismantled (the USA has enough oil on-shore) OR the entire Middle East North Africa is colonized (to protect minorities of all stripes including Shias and Sunnis). If the USA persists with the familiar bombs and carrots strategy, then it will surely be transformed into an ineffective master-villain despised by all (see Afghanistan, Libya).
…………………..

This is how a Nobel Peace Prize laureate goes to war. He
smiles warmly at the members of the U.N. General Assembly. He mentions
his grandmother’s village in Kenya and notes that “Islam teaches peace.”
He admits his country’s own flaws, praises “the path of diplomacy and
peace,” and asserts that lasting gains cannot be “won at the barrel of a
gun.”


Also, he wades a good 19 minutes into his 40-minute speech (the official time limit is 15 minutes) before getting to the nub of the matter: “The terrorist group known as ISIL must be degraded and ultimately destroyed.”
….
“In
the most horrific crimes imaginable, innocent human beings have been
beheaded, with videos of the atrocity distributed to shock the
conscience of the world,” he says. “No god condones this terror. No
grievance justifies these actions. There can be no reasoning, no
negotiation, with this brand of evil. The only language understood by
killers like this is the language of force. So the United States of
America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle this network of
death.”

….
Network of Death! A linguistic heir to George W. Bush’s
Axis of Evil, perchance? “Those who have joined ISIL should leave the
battlefield while they can,” the peacemaker threatens.

….
This
is a different Obama from the one who spoke in Cairo five years ago,
urging a new era in relations between America and the Muslim world.
Though similar themes appeared in both addresses, the 2014 Obama was
more demanding of the Muslim world — and less apologetic about America’s
role — as he lectured Muslim leaders to make a serious fight against
extremists.


In the 2009 speech, Obama invoked the “Holy Koran”
five times and asserted that “any world order that elevates one nation
or group of people over another will inevitably fail.” He spoke out
against the U.S. use of torture and said he would close the Guantanamo
Bay prison. (He didn’t.) He spoke of the “intolerable” situation faced
by Palestinians and called for a stop to Israeli settlements. 


“The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than
the narrow hatred of a few,” the new president said. “Islam is not part
of the problem in combating violent extremism — it is an important part
of promoting peace.”

….
On Wednesday, the second-term president went
relatively easy on Israel, instead telling Arab countries to stop using
the conflict “as an excuse to distract people from problems at home.”

….
Obama
was stern in his instructions for the Muslims: “It is time for the
world, especially in Muslim communities, to explicitly, forcefully and
consistently reject the ideology of organizations like al-Qaeda and
ISIL,” also known as the Islamic State. 

….
He went on at some length about
the intolerance of clerics who preach hate and the “hypocrisy” of those
who fund terrorism.
And he instructed Arab
nations to “acknowledge the destruction wrought by proxy wars and terror
campaigns between Sunni and Shia across the Middle East.”

….
“In
this century, we have faced a more lethal and ideological brand of
terrorists who have perverted one of the world’s great religions,” he
said. “With access to technology that allows small groups to do great
harm, they have embraced a nightmarish vision that would divide the
world into adherents and infidels, killing as many innocent civilians as
possible, employing the most brutal methods.”

…..

Link: washingtonpost.com/barack-obama-makes-the-case-for-war

….

regards

Brown Pundits