Yoga for the 0.1% (and neocons)

“A free society does make people phenomenally
wealthy—and this is a wonderful, beautiful blessing—but not enough to
give people a satisfying life,” he continued,…. a self-declared “warrior
for free enterprise” 

From Nazi hipsters we now move on to neocon imperialists and the (in)famous American Enterprise Institute (AEI) which hosts Ayaan Hirsi Ali as a Fellow. Arthur Brooks wants to get in touch with his inner hippie and who better than Sri Sri Ravi Shankar to act as a go-between. Especially now that India has impeccable credentials as a Hindu nation, which has managed to drive out the British and Mughal empires with (mostly) spiritual power and a democratic revolution.

We agree that a change of image would be good for the neocons. The mad Iraq war that they helped launch has right now created the specter of 100 years religious war in the Middle East. If a little bit of yoga helps to calm the nerves, that may not be such a bad thing. For the millions (plus) victims of war unfortunately, this raising of inner consciousness will not be useful.
….
There were more turbans and saris among the suits and ties
than usual at the American Enterprise Institute this week when AEI
President Arthur Brooks welcomed Hindu spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravi
Shankar for a conversation on human flourishing.


“I wish I could
tell you global brotherhood is best served through greater and greater
amounts of money,” Brooks said as the heavily bearded Shankar, dressed
in a luminous white robe, sat quietly in a chair, “but I can’t tell you
that because it’s not true,” he concluded with a flourish. 

Everything
Brooks does is with a flourish, and his new venture into what some
would call humanism is a striking departure for the venerable
conservative think tank. “A free society does make people phenomenally
wealthy—and this is a wonderful, beautiful blessing—but not enough to
give people a satisfying life,” he continued, an insight that shouldn’t
be surprising until you consider the source: a self-declared “warrior
for free enterprise” who heads a group dedicated to spreading the gospel
of capitalism and governed by a board populated by hedge-fund
millionaires.

When Brooks first outlined his idea for a series of conversations dedicated to human flourishing and what makes people happy,
a colleague asked only half-jokingly, “Do you actually handle snakes?”
Emotional IQ, meditating, getting in touch with your inner self is not
the typical fare at AEI. “I’m such an evangelist for this, I get a lot
of ribbing,” Brooks told The Daily Beast. He explained that this is his
way of getting past the “left-right dichotomy that’s so boring and
unproductive” in politics today and getting to “the fundamentals of what
people are looking for in their lives.” 

In a think tank with 200 scholars, the reaction to Brooks’ spiritual journey
is a mixed bag. “Some people are all-in on this, and others are just
doing their work, no problem,” he says. One resident fellow who has been
in the room when Brooks tells AEI donors whose wealth puts them in the
top tenth of the 1 percent that conservatism isn’t about them, that it’s
about the least among us: “Even if it’s a ploy, that’s a message that
leaves a lot of them uncomfortable.” 



Others at AEI when asked if the 50-year-old Brooks is going through a
midlife crisis say they’ve seen no evidence of that. They point to his
longstanding interest in the subject of happiness; he’s published one
book and is writing another one. Besides, Brooks says he’s already had
his existential crisis. It occurred when he became a full professor with
tenure at Syracuse University. “I had more job security than a French
bureaucrat,” he says, and it wasn’t enough, he wasn’t happy.

“I
have the weirdest background for someone who is president of a think
tank,” he says, adding with a laugh, “I’m just a washed-up French horn
player.” Hardly, though he did leave college to pursue music and was the
principal French horn player with the orchestra in Barcelona, Spain. He
got his bachelor’s degree through correspondence courses, and went on
to get a Ph.D. in economics, becoming the true believer he is today in
the power of free enterprise to lift people out of poverty.

A
self-declared independent, he says AEI has a “moral obligation to look
for the deeper strands of thinking. It’s not to get more conservatives
elected or to hurt liberals,” he says. He sees a potential truce between
left and right. “Let’s declare peace on the social safety net and war
on crony capitalism.” Even so, AEI is mostly a bystander as Republicans
fight among themselves to squelch the Tea Party grassroots. Allied with
business interests and the Chamber of Commerce, Brooks acknowledges the
assault on capitalism, and with these conversations about human
flourishing seeks to address the growing divide in wealth. 



When the Dalai Lama visited AEI in February and told everyone he was a
socialist, it was an awakening of sorts for many of the more staid
scholars, and even better, from AEI’s perspective, was the Dalai Lama’s
admission that he felt more kindly about capitalism after his
conversation with Brooks. He called the AEI president “the spiritual
leader of the capitalist people,” a moniker that Brooks embraces.

Brooks cut to the chase with Shankar, asking “the big question”
on his mind: “What’s the secret to happiness?” The audience laughed at
the bluntness, and at the expectation that an answer could be had so
easily. “Just be yourself,” Shankar advised. Who influenced him the
most? His mother, he said, but “anytime, anywhere, people can inspire
you. It’s an internal phenomenon. You are in the moment. Inspiration is
opening the source of energy.” Brooks wondered if that meant he could
inspire Shankar, a comment that had the audience laughing once again.

Citing a study that shows only a third of Americans consider
themselves happy, Brooks asked what is the one thing Shankar would do to
increase that number. “Why one thing?” he responded playfully, before
explaining calmly that stress simply means too much to do, and too
little time. Either increase your energy level or reduce what you do. Go
slowly, he said, “Drive behind a bicycle.”

……

Link: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/27/dc-s-top-neocon-finds-his-inner-hippie.html

…..

regards

#nipster

In February, Tim and Kevin started Balaclava Kueche,
Germany’s first Nazi vegan cooking show…the first episode: mixed salad, tofu scramble.
“The left-wing doesn’t have a prior claim to veganism,” says Tim.
“Industrial meat production is incompatible with our nationalist and
socialist world views.” 

Even Nazis can be hipsters and wear Che Guevara uniforms. It is a strange world indeed.

Back in his 2010 book What Was the Hipster?,
Mark Greif described the term as meaning a “consumer” who “aligns
himself both with rebel subculture and with the dominant class and thus
opens up a poisonous conduit between the two.” 


……
It’s a rainy Sunday evening in May, in the town of Weiden, in
northeastern Bavaria, and Patrick Schroeder, whom the German press has
dubbed the “Nazi-hipster,” is preparing for his big webcam entrance. As
the opening sequence for his weekly Internet TV show, FSN.tv,
plays silently in the background, he ties a bandana stitched with the
slogan “H8” around his mouth and fiddles with his mouse. A map of
Germany in 1937 hangs on the wall above him.



“If the Third Reich was so bad, it would have been toppled,”
he argues, before the filming begins. “Every half-intelligent person
knows there is no system where everything was bad.”



FSN.tv is Germany’s only neo-Nazi Internet TV show, and in
the two years since it has existed it has turned Schroeder into a
well-known, if highly controversial, figure in the German extreme right,
largely because he has been open about his desire to give the German
neo-Nazi movement a friendlier, hipper face.



Over the past year, partly because of leaders like Schroeder and
partly because of the unstoppable globalization of youth culture, the
hipsterification of the German neo-Nazi scene has begun to gain steam.
This winter, the German media came up with a new term, “nipster,” to
describe the trend of people dressing like Brooklyn hipsters at Nazi
events.


The term hipster has, of course, always been notoriously slippery. Back in his 2010 book What Was the Hipster?,
Mark Greif described the term as meaning a “consumer” who “aligns
himself both with rebel subculture and with the dominant class and thus
opens up a poisonous conduit between the two.”
 

But in Germany, as
elsewhere, the newly discovered hipster is often reduced to its more
superficial component parts: “skinny jeans, a bushy beard, bright
sunglasses” (Welt), “strange, nerdy and somehow different,” (Sueddeutsche Zeitung), “self-important culture snobs” (Tagesspiegel). Here, the hipster is simultaneously a uniform, a cooler-than-thou weltanschauung and signpost of globalized American youth culture and consumerism.



“We don’t want to cut ourselves off,” Knape says, about hipster
culture. “I see rap and hip-hop, for example, as a way of transporting
our message.” In recent years, a number of extreme-right hip-hop acts
have emerged in Germany — with names like Makss Damage and Dee Ex.
Despite the awkward politics of using hip-hop to preach the virtues of
German identity, they’ve amassed a small, but significant presence
within the scene. Dee Ex, for example, has over 7,000 likes on Facebook
and posts photos of herself in a revealing outfit on her blog. There is now neo-Nazi techno (biggest act: DJ Adolf) and neo-Nazi reggae. 

Knape, on his end, has also gotten increasingly invested in online
culture: “The Internet allows us to reach people we can’t reach on the
street.” Now young people can get in touch with him over Facebook or
e-mail without their parents, or anybody else, finding out. “They don’t
need to out themselves immediately,” he says. Knape is especially proud
of his viral-video outreach: last year, his group filmed a “Harlem Shake” video.
In the JN video, people in masks bounce around junked cars while one of
them holds up a sign saying “Have more sex with Nazis, unprotected.”
 It has over 17,000 hits on YouTube.


But, perhaps partly because of this
internationalization of German culture, Knape struggles to define the
“German traditions” he’s trying to preserve. It’s understandable:
Germany, even by European standards, is a supremely contrived state
composed of 300 formerly distinct political entities. Founded in 1871,
it is also younger even than Canada — there’s a reason Hitler had to
reach back to centuries-old, mythical folklore when trying to sell
people on the idea of Germanic superiority. 

Knape says he wants more
people to mark the “Sonnenwende” or solstice — a celebration the Nazis
tried to revive in the Hitler era — for example, and to preserve the
German language. He is concerned that “these days, we see a lot of
people mixing German and English” — though he acknowledges that when it
comes to technology, it’s “not easy to avoid.” He notes, with some
resignation, that there is no German word for “hashtag.”


In their latest 2013 report, the Bundesverfassungschutz
concluded that there are approximately 22,000 members of the extreme
right in Germany, including 9,600 who are “willing to engage in
violence.” According to official statistics,they committed 473 violent
crimes against foreigners last year — a shocking 20 percent rise over
the previous year.



In September, for example, three suspected neo-Nazis brutally beat a
15-year-old in Saxony, allegedly because the boy was half Taiwanese. The
same month, a Turkish immigrant was nearly beaten to death by a group
of nine alleged neo-Nazis in a train station in Saxony-Anhalt and this
February, a group of more than a dozen neo-Nazis walked into a community
center in the town of Ballstaedt, in the state of Thuringia, and began
assaulting the attendees at a party, sending two of them to the
hospital.


Although the extreme right has existed in Germany, in various forms,
since World War II, the neo-Nazi scene as it exists today largely took
shape in the 1980s, and spread dramatically after the fall of the Berlin
Wall. Especially in the post-reunification East, where young people
were suddenly robbed of the Communist strictures and institutions they
had grown up with, extreme-right politics provided an easy outside
explanation for their economic and cultural alienation:
multiculturalism, asylum seekers, American “imperialism,” Israel and
global big business.



Around the turn of the 21st century, the skinhead look waned and the
scene underwent another philosophical and aesthetic transformation.
“Society had started to react against the extreme right, and it became
less attractive for young people to stigmatize themselves,” says Simone
Rafael, the editor-in-chief of Netz Gegen Nazis,
a blog that monitors the extreme right. As a result, a new
extreme-right group, the Autonomous Nationalists (AN), began aping the
look of the extreme left — black hoodies, black pants and even Che
Guevara T-shirts (with the words “Not only Che would be with us”) — and
incorporating traditionally progressive issues like environmentalism and
animal rights  into neo-Nazi ideology. “Once [neo-Nazi leaders] saw it
was successful, it was taken up by the scene,” says Rafael.



These developments helped spur the notion, now championed by Knape
and Schroeder, that young neo-Nazis should be allowed to dress however
they want, as long as they have the “right” anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim,
anti-Semitic ideas. This newly relaxed approach allows neo-Nazi leaders
to attract young people from different subcultures and makes neo-Nazis
more difficult for their opponents to identify. “Now the neo-Nazi youth
culture is really broad,” says Christoph Schulze, one of several
left-wing activists who assemble the annual Versteckspiel (“Hide and seek”), a glossary of symbols used by members of the extreme-right to surreptitiously identify one another.



Those aforementioned symbols include everything from number codes
(the most obvious: “88” to replace “Heil Hitler” — because “H” is the
eighth letter in the alphabet) to logos (an eagle catching a Christian ichthys
— a symbol of Germanic strength over “degenerates”) to sayings (“14
words,” which stands for a quote by American white nationalist David
Lane). “The movement is always changing,” Schulze says. “One thing goes
out of fashion and there’s already something new. This year it’s the
hipster.”


The nipster came to widespread attention in February of this year,
when a photographer snapped a picture of a group of men wearing skinny
jeans, unruly beards, plug piercings — and, in one case, a tote bag with
the words “don’t shove me, I’ve got a joghurt in my bag” — at an NPD
march in Magdeburg.
The photo quickly went viral in Germany and bloggers
came up with the new portmanteau. Taz, the left-leaning Berlin
daily, made a list of other hipster stances the Nazis could adopt
(“change your favorite band when they become too mainstream.”). 



In recent years, a growing number of neo-Nazi groups have staged
savvy viral campaigns, including one where they dressed up as the Sesame Street
Cookie Monster and distributed pamphlets to schoolchildren, and another
involving a man in a bear costume calling himself the “deportation
bear” and posing in front of Hanover Turkish shops.
“They can easily
produce something that has the appearance of looking hip,” says Koehler.
“These aren’t just dumb East German youth — they understand how to
package their political ideology.” 



Tim and Kevin, two 21-year-old self-proclaimed “nationalists and
socialists” (“but anyone who reads this will know we’re Nazis”) from
Hanover — who did not want to give their real names — say they have also
noticed more people in the scene dressing like “hipsters,” with skinny
pants and tote bags. “It’s noticeable,” Tim says, over the phone, and
explains that everything that emerges in German mainstream culture ends
up in the [neo-Nazi] scene, just with a delay. “We don’t walk around the
city center with our eyes closed,” he says, “we see what people are
wearing on TV.” He also agrees that the Nazi Tumblr style has gotten
“more youthful” and “looser.”



In February, Tim and Kevin started Balaclava Kueche,
Germany’s first Nazi vegan cooking show. In each episode, the two
chatty, fast-talking men wear facemasks and earnestly explain to viewers
how to make an array of vegan dishes (the first episode: mixed salad, tofu scramble).
“The left-wing doesn’t have a prior claim to veganism,” says Tim.
“Industrial meat production is incompatible with our nationalist and
socialist world views.”  



And then there are the Identitaeren, a two-year-old group
with origins in France that has gotten widespread attention for its use
of stylish viral videos to promote anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant
sentiment. Although claiming to be anti-Nazi, they, like many members of
the extreme right, espouse a concept called ethnopluralism, which
argues that ethnic groups should only live in their respective home
countries.
Nils Altmieks, the movement’s boyish, 27-year-old current
leader, argues that Europe should be for Europeans — and not, for
example, Africans — and cites the United States as an example of the
dangers of embracing heterogeneity. “Multiculturalism isn’t a
contribution to cultural understanding, it’s a cornerstone for
conflict,” he says, over Skype. He becomes wishy-washy when pressed
about the exact borders of Europe (“Some might view Russia as European”) and can’t account for countries, like Canada, with high immigration and low crime.



German extremism researcher Alexander Haeusler has warned that the Identitaeren
are insidiously attempting to make “racism modern and hip.” Last year,
group members filmed themselves disrupting a multiculturalism conference
with a blaring boombox and they also have a dedicated video blogger — a
stylish-looking young man who often wears thick plastic glasses frames
and a hoodie and whose most recent dispatch is about the moral peril of eating ethnic food. In other videos they’ve dumped rubble in front of the office of a Green Party politician and posed with silly-looking 300-inspired shields
in front of the Brandenburg Gate. “We aren’t consciously a hipster
movement, but today’s young people grew up with this background,” says
Altmieks. “This is part of society.” His favorite movie, he says, is Braveheart. 


Coincidentally or not, the emergence of the nipster has taken place
at the same time as the rise of a new far-right political scene in
Europe: In this May’s European elections, the National Front — the
anti-immigrant party headed by Marine Le Pen — won the biggest voting
share of parties in the French elections, and the British United Kingdom
Independence Party won 27.5 percent of the vote in the U.K. Many people
link these parties’ success to their ability to package themselves as a
friendlier, less-threatening far right. Dutch political scientist Cas
Mudde has argued
that these parties largely swept into power by linking the euro crisis
“to their core ideological features: nativism, authoritarianism and
populism.” 



The current German wave of, for instance, hip, vegan neo-Nazis
functions in a similar way. Rafael says they attempt to slide into
debates where young people wouldn’t expect them, and then sell their
politics as a palatable outlet. “They use subjects like globalization
and animal protection as entry points, and then offer a very simple
worldview that makes complex subjects very easy to understand,” says
Rafael. “Of course, in the end, it’s always about racism and
anti-Semitism and nationalism.”  The danger — in both cases — is that
extreme-right positions might quietly shift into the mainstream.



Over the past two years, Cynthia Miller-Idriss, an associate
professor at American University in Washington, D.C., has been
conducting research with young people in Berlin schools who are on the
periphery of the extreme-right. She says that, if anything, the change
in neo-Nazi fashion has made it more difficult to step in when young
people are being embroiled in the scene. “If you were a teacher,” she
says, “you used to be able to identify a skinhead in your class and you
could think of ways to intervene. But now it’s harder to mainstream
society to understand who these young people are and to engage with
them.”



Miller-Idriss suggests that for a generation raised on Facebook and Twitter, it may no longer feel ridiculous to, say, love Rihanna
in real life but disparage black people on Facebook. “The social media
space allows young people to have different expressions of their
identities in different places,” she says. “This generation of youth
likes the idea of having more control over their own identity. They’ve
realized your style doesn’t have to be connected to your ideology. You
can dress however you want to and still be a neo-Nazi.”



The stakes in the fight against extremism, of course, are more than
just semantic. Several weeks ago, after Dortmund’s local elections, a
group of about 20 neo-Nazis appeared outside city hall to protest the
recent banning of an extreme-right group. They yelled “Germany for the
Germans” and “foreigners out” and began singing the national anthem
before attacking people outside the building with pepper spray and
broken bottles, injuring ten. Dortmund city councilors have been meeting
under police protection ever since. 


Back in Bavaria, Patrick Schroeder is driving around downtown Weiden
with his former co-host, Martin, a clean-cut 27-year-old computer
programmer. Martin is not his real name, but he’s already lost his job
twice because of his politics, and is worried about jeopardizing his
newest position. Both men are complaining about the repression they face
on the job market as neo-Nazis — since finishing his training as a
salesman, Schroeder has only worked for companies tied to the scene.
“We’re the new Jews in Germany,” he says, “except we don’t wear stars.” 



They pull into the parking lot of a local Ernest Hemingway-themed
restaurant and walk into a room crowded with people watching a soccer
game. Heads turn. Schroeder is wearing a T-shirt of an extreme-right
band called Terrorsphaera (“Terrorsphere”) with blood-like paint
splatters. Martin, on the other hand, is dressed in gingham shirt, and
looks like a character on Silicon Valley.
The waitresses are all blonde and wearing “We love Germany” T-shirts,
in honor of the upcoming World Cup, and as he sits down, the multiple
men in the room give him dirty looks.



Schroeder also seems aware that the concepts of Germany and Europe —
and, for that matter, America — are becoming increasingly theoretical.
In the background, a soccer game is playing on the bar’s big screens,
and it helps launch him on a tortured metaphor explaining why Asian
immigrants don’t qualify as Germans. “It’s like if the Chinese bought 22
Brazilians and gave them Chinese passports and used them to win the
World Cup,” he mopes.
“If everybody’s the same, then what’s the point?”



……

Link: http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/heil-hipster-the-young-neo-nazis-trying-to-put-a-stylish-face-on-hate-20140623

…….

regards

Why It May Be Different This Time

The media has lately been full of news about the rapid advances being made by the ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) jihadis in Iraq and Syria. The reasons behind their success have been much discussed, and are by now fairly well understood. They are a resourceful, organized, well-funded group who are capitalizing on the extreme disaffection felt by many Sunni Iraqis chafing under the naked sectarianism of the Maliki non-government. This makes ISIS a serious threat to the interests of various Middle Eastern powers as well as the West. In this, they have much in common with Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, the Shabab in Somalia, Boko Haram, and such extremist jihadi groups seeking to repeal modern civilization in the name of a puritanical ideology. However, there is a factor that, in my opinion, makes ISIS a far more dangerous threat.

The Achilles’ heel of all jihadist movements (as opposed to, say, Hamas or Hezbollah) is their inability to resist the urge for violence. This acts as a self-limiting feature, and keeps these groups from winning the allegiance of large populations. I sometimes think of them as following an “ebola strategy”. Just as ebola kills its victims too quickly to truly become a sustainable pandemic, jihadi groups tend to alienate the populations they live in, and can only maintain whatever control they acquire by relentless violence. With this approach, they may succeed briefly in limited regions, but have no hope of truly gaining the allegiance of large populations in countries such as Pakistan, or even Libya or Syria.

The jihadis will truly become an existential threat to the rest of Muslim society the day they turn away from mindless violence and start building social capital. That’s why ISIS, with its financial resources and organizational savvy, is so especially dangerous. Because of the large area they have already acquired, the sympathy of a significant population based on deep resentment and, above all, their very deep pockets, ISIS is the first jihadi force that may actually be able to create a de facto state in the name of their ideology. And there is at least some anecdotal evidence – countered by many other reports, to be sure – that they are being quite selective in their oppression. If they continue this strategy, and use their financial resources to provide social support to the populations who are supporting them, they could create a state that, over time, might win over much larger populations in the Sunni Muslim world – especially in countries like Pakistan, where tens of millions are already invested in the notion of an “Islamic State”. They are held somewhat at bay by the fact that no successful “Islamic State” has existed outside of the idealized version from Islam’s earliest days. If any remotely apparently-functional “Islamic State” were to emerge, the barriers would fall and we could easily see a positive feedback process that would tip a lot of Muslim societies in a more extreme direction. It is also especially important that the core element of ISIS is Arab. Given the hierarchy of regard within the Muslim world, it is highly unlikely that Arab societies would gravitate to a non-Arab one – however successful it may be – but non-Arab Muslims in Central and South Asia (and perhaps elsewhere) will much more easily look up to an Arab society seen as virtuous – even when it is not successful as a state (which it certainly won’t be). Saudi Arabia may have served this purpose, but its alliance with the US is a major impediment. ISIS could provide a guilt-free option.

The last group to try building an “Islamic State” as an example were the Taliban in pre-9/11 Afghanistan, but they were never going to succeed because: a) They were not Arab; b) They had limited resources; c) They  failed to curb their violent instincts; and d) They had no sophisticated feel for history. Pakistan, of course, has been trying to make itself into an ideal “Islamic State” for decades, but the product doesn’t sell because it is based entirely on fictions. Attempts in Algeria and Egypt were nipped in the bud, and Turkey’s re-Islamization is still too modern – and too royalist – to attract transnational allegiance of fundamentalist Muslim populations. And, of course, both Pakistan and Turkey are non-Arab (though Turks can probably command allegiance in Arab societies based on the vestigial memories of Ottoman rule).

It is hard to say what the strategists of the Great Powers are thinking, but if their strategy involves allowing ISIS, even temporarily, to create an actual state in Mesopotamia, they will regret it sorely – and pay for it with blood and treasure for decades or longer.

Best (non-evil) company for working fathers

Yes, a time will come when a working father will be declared to be an endangered species. 

Even in India, we see a bit of this: as women are liberated from societal norms (patriarchy), men are liberated as well, and without the compulsion of feeding wife and family revert (that famous word) to a situation where they are barely able to feed themselves. Women who love such beta (theta? zeta??) men are disappointed. Women who love alpha men feel angry (and disrespected).

(This is not a rant against women’s lib, there is no justification for slavery)

As we know, there has been no such thing called society in the West for sometime now (UK 1980s) and now it is increasingly true in the (incrementally) liberated East as well. Of course we do have non-liberal societal models (in large spots in India and South Asia) as well but they are fighting a losing battle with modernity (and over the body of women).
………
So, the story that’s gone viral is that a little girl named Katie
somehow not only wrote but managed to ensure that her father’s employer
got the following letter:

Dear Google worker,

Can you please make sure when daddy goes to work, he gets one day off.
Like he can get a day off on Wednesday.
Because daddy ONLY gets a day off on Saturday.


From, Katie


P.S. It is daddy’s BIRTHDAY!
P.PS. IT is summer, you know.



The employer’s response?

And because a good deed deserves praise, or because so many people
want it to act as an example worth emulating for their employers, the
letters have gone viral, ensuring great PR for Google as a result.
Clearly a good deed didn’t go unrewarded at least in this case.

…….

Link: http://www.outlookindia.com/blogs/post/Young-Girl-Writes-To-Google-Asking-For-A-Day-Off-For-Daddy/3297/31

……

regards

Glorious victory!!!

116.5 Eranga to Anderson,

OUT,

short ball, Anderson fends it off and loops a catch to backward square!!! Can you believe it!

JM Anderson c Herath b Eranga 0 (81m 55b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00

A superlative 2nd last ball victory of Sri Lanka against ex-colonial power England. A fitting farewell to Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara. The superstars also were part of Sri Lanka’s win over India in World T20 in Bangladesh. Bravo and goodbye.

Also grand cricket from Birmingham born Pak-Brit Moeen Ali, who nearly achieved the impossible for England with a maiden Test century. Great company by Jimmy Anderson for a 55 ball, 81 min magnificent zero. Great beard and great expectations from now onwards!!!
……………………


Sri Lanka won when they had almost abandoned hope. From the penultimate ball of a gripping final day, Shaminda Eranga
found a hostile delivery to bring their first series win in England.
James Anderson, who could only fend it to the leg side in
self-preservation, dropped to his haunches in despair. Moeen Ali’s immense maiden Test century was briefly forgotten, submerged beneath an ecstatic Sri Lankan celebration.


An indomitable backs-to-the-wall display by Moeen had come so close to
sparing England: an unbeaten 108, unblemished even, made from 281 balls.
England’s last five wickets had clung on for all but two balls of the
final day. Pride had been salvaged, perhaps a captain had been spared
too, but it is Sri Lanka who can celebrate a special moment in their
Test history.


Sri Lanka’s last pair held out for five balls in the first Test at
Lord’s. This time the task was much harder for Moeen and Anderson: 20.2
overs. Even in Cardiff, when Anderson and Monty Panesar famously held
off Australia in 2009, they only saw out 11.3. This time Anderson
summoned a heroic 55-ball nought, all signifying nothing.


Tension slowly seeped into the final day as it only can in Test cricket.
The crowd was sparse – Yorkshire had folded its arms in condemnation,
convinced like all but the most incorrigibly optimistic that England’s
abject collapse to 57 for 5, well adrift of a target of 350, had sealed
their fate – but a night’s sleep had cleared muddled heads and
Headingley, treacherous Headingley, not the sort of pitch to turn your
back on, behaved like an old softie.


Moeen, a cricketing free spirit, played with such judgment and
self-denial that he must have explored parts of himself never visited
before. He surely surprised even himself, suppressing the silky ambition
of his batting during a strikingly unselfish innings in which his most
positive shots were expertly selected. In only his second Test, he made
light of his international experience with impassioned advice to
England’s tail.


Only with nine wickets down did Moeen seek to steal the strike, only now
did his timing begin to go awry as the demands weighed upon him. But
his concentration was unwavering. His century came with half-an-hour
remaining, flicking Nuwan Pradeep off his pads, but it had always felt
like an afterthought in an innings where he appeared entirely consumed
by England’s survival. This was not as much an innings as personal
growth before your eyes.


Even in defeat, there should be no doubt who will be the recipient of
England’s annual Beard of the Year award – and, if that is one of the
most frivolous awards around, this time it would have a more serious
message. There are times when the wider social impact of a performance
in sport must also be recognised even in a match report – and this was
one of them.


A sole spectator earlier in the Test who observed, however unthinkingly,
that Moeen’s beard suggested he should be blowing up buildings was
rightly reported to stewards and warned. Muslim cricketers have played
for England before, but none had been so visibly proud to be a role
model. With every stout-hearted block, Moeen made such comments appear
ever more ignorant and, for those who questioned as much, integrated
himself – and more importantly his beard – deep into the fabric of the
England side.

……..


Link: http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-v-sri-lanka-2014/content/story/755265.html

………..

regards

The (political) planes of Pakistan

Sept 10, 2007…Islamabad airport….Musharraf forcibly deported Sharif to Saudi Arabia…April 14, 2005….Zardari was taken
into custody from inside the aircraft when he landed at Lahore airport…
Oct 12,
1999…..PIA’s commercial plane carrying Gen
Musharraf was denied landing permission at the Karachi airport 

While all South Asian nations enjoy a bit of drama-bazi, it seems that in Pakistan things move at a higher plane…so to speak. It is a real musical chairs fun and games, Sharif trying to thwart Musharraf, Musharraf trying to stymie Benazir, Musharraf  stifling Sharif, Sharif sabotaging Qadri…the airports are where the action is. 
……..
Monday’s diversion of Dr Tahirul Qadri’s plane
from Islamabad to Lahore is the latest addition to a list replete with
the political role of aeroplanes in the country’s history.


Dr
Qadri is not the first political figure to have refused to disembark
from an aircraft without seeking some guarantees. Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif and former president Asif Ali Zardari had also had to negotiate
with the administration inside their planes when they landed in Pakistan
during the rule of Gen Pervez Musharraf. The retired general himself
had taken over the government in a bloodless military coup after a plane
hijacking drama in 1999.

The latest scenes at the Islamabad and
Lahore airports refreshed the memories of the people who had witnessed
similar events six years ago when Mr Musharraf forcibly deported Mr
Sharif to Saudi Arabia after the latter attempted to return to Pakistan
from London and end his seven-year exile.

The Musharraf regime had
taken the plea that the Sharif brothers should not return to the
country because they had gone to Saudi Arabia under an agreement that
they would stay away from politics for 10 years.

However, Nawaz
Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif declared that they would return to the
country, come what may, after the Supreme Court ruled on Aug 23, 2007,
that they were free to come to their homeland.

On Sept 10, Nawaz
Sharif left London on a PIA flight with a team of journalists and some
PML-N members, but only to be deported again to Saudi Arabia in a
special plane.

And two days before his planned return to the
country, Lebanese politician Saad Hariri and Saudi intelligence chief
Muqrin bin Abdul Aziz had come to Islamabad to take him back to Saudi
Arabia in the special plane hours after landing at the airport here.

Mr
Sharif later returned to Pakistan on Nov 25, a month after then PPP
chief Benazir Bhutto landed at Karachi airport after ending her
self-exile.

In April 2005, former president Zardari was taken
into custody from inside the aircraft when he landed at Lahore airport
to lead the PPP in the absence of his wife Benazir.

The PPP
workers were not allowed to receive Mr Zardari at the airport and even
the journalists who accompanied the leader from Dubai were manhandled by
security personnel.

The plane crash of former president and army
chief Gen Ziaul Haq in August 1988 in Bahawalpur and the denial of
landing permission to the aircraft carrying former president Musharraf
in Karachi were the two main events that changed the political scenario.

It
was after the death of Gen Zia in the mysterious military plane crash
that the country saw a real democratic transformation and four elections
were held within nine years — from 1988 to 1997.

On Oct 12,
1999 then prime minister Sharif removed Gen Musharraf from the post of
chief of the army staff when he was on his way back to Karachi from
Colombo, where he had gone to attend the Sri Lankan army’s 50th
anniversary celebrations.

PIA’s commercial plane carrying Gen
Musharraf was denied landing permission at the Karachi airport. The
plane remained in the air till the time military commanders on the
ground toppled the government and arrested Mr Sharif, who later faced a
trial on charges of hijacking.

During the last days of Gen
Musharraf’s rule after the 2008 elections, there were rumours that a
special plane was parked at the Islamabad airport to take him abroad. He
denied the presence of any such plane, but later left the country after
resigning as president in the wake of a no-confidence motion against
him and started living in self-exile in the UK.

Just two months
before the general elections in May last year, Mr Musharraf returned to
Karachi to take part in the polls from the platform of his newly-formed
All Pakistan Muslim League.

On April 1, Gen Musharraf departed
for Islamabad from Karachi in a chartered plane. This time again, his
plane was diverted to Lahore, but only because of bad weather.

……

Link: http://www.dawn.com/news/1114707/political-role-of-aeroplanes-in-pakistan/

…….

regards

Jail time for captain cool?

The issue is blasphemy (and in our opinion the imagery looks fairly blasphemous). Ideally speaking, the Indian state should be strong enough to say that creative expression is mostly protected without fear or favor. But that is not to be- as long as there are votes for looking the other way. And once you favor the loud and proud people of one community you simply incentivize loud and proud people in other communities as well.

The liberal response is that (unlike the desert-origin religions) (a) Hinduism does not have a canon (what is Hinduism?), (b) Hinduism has no concept of blasphemy. ….etc. but the fundamental point (as per the law) is the question that such an image creates ill-feelings or not. And there is no accounting for feelings, especially amongst zealots (the opportunists are another story).

Free speech is a must for a liberal society. Free speech is also meaningless unless unpopular speech is protected. The overall effect of these law-fares will be to stifle art and argument and create deserts out of green-fields.
………………..
An Indian court on Tuesday issued an arrest warrant for Indian
cricket team captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni for allegedly hurting
religious sentiments of Hindus.

Indian news media reports
stated that a local court in Andhra Pradesh issued the warrant after
Dhoni failed to appear in court despite being summoned on three
occasions.

The police has been directed to present Dhoni in court on July 16.
……
The case relates to a picture on the cover of an Indian magazine
Business Today which carried a picture of Dhoni portrayed as Hindu god
Vishnu in its April 2013 edition. The picture bore the sub title “God of
Big Deals”, with the cricketing legend holding products of several
companies including a shoe in his hand.

…..
A local leader of the
Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) had filed a petition in the court in
February this year alleging that the cricketer hurt the sentiments of
Hindus by denigrating a Hindu god.

The summons issued by the court
to Dhoni on three occasions were returned. The court, which took up the
hearing on Tuesday, issued the arrest warrant.

Similar petitions against Dhoni were filed in Delhi, Pune and other cities.
………..

Link: http://www.dawn.com/news/1114828/indian-court-issues-arrest-warrant-for-ms-dhoni

………

regards

They killed the judge (who nixed Saddam)

Judge
Rahman was…
accused of being biased, for he comes from Halabja, scene of the 1988
poison attack….. Many
of Rahman’s kin were said to be victims….The
judge himself was reportedly detained and tortured by Saddam’s security
agent

….
He tried to escape Baghdad but was kidnapped and executed. A sign of the times to come.

As we have pointed out before, this is a fight for dominance in your mohalla and parity outside it.

We have to admit that it is not a bad model for minorities (keeps them safe in ghettos, protects culture and ways of life). OTOH the stigma is great and stifling because (as is often the case) there is an external enemy (imagined or otherwise) which shares kinship with the internal minority viz. Muslims in India (Pakistan), Hindus in Bangladesh (India), Tamils in Sri Lanka (India), Rohingyas in Burma (Bangladesh) and Shias in Pakistan (Iran).
………
Islamic
State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) fighters have reportedly captured and
executed the judge who sentenced Saddam Hussein to death, a Facebook
post attributed to Ibrahim al-Douri, who was a top aide of the fallen
Iraqi leader, said. A Jordanian MP made a similar claim on his Facebook
page. The Iraqi government hasn’t confirmed the killing, but issued no
denial.


The International Business Times, reporting Judge Raouf
Abdul Rahman’s capture, sourced it to a Facebook post by al-Douri. New
York Times recently called al-Douri the force behind the dramatic ISIS
offensive. He was deputy chairman of the Iraqi Command Council until the
2003 US-led invasion. In 2007, he was named leader of the banned Iraqi
Ba’ath Party.

Quoting MP Khalil Attieh’s Facebook entry, Daily
Mail, New York Post and some news websites said judge Rahman, who signed
the death-by-hanging verdict against Saddam in 2006, was seized as he
left Baghdad on June 16 and executed two days later. The Macedonian
International News Agency too put out the news quoting Egyptian daily
Al-Mesyroon. Attieh’s post claimed Rahman tried to escape Baghdad
disguised in a dancer’s costume, but was nabbed.

Judge
Rahman was a Kurd and condemned for ordering Saddam’s hanging. He was
accused of being biased, for he comes from Halabja, scene of the 1988
poison attack, allegedly under the erstwhile Iraqi leader’s orders. Many
of Rahman’s kin were said to be victims of that horrific attack. The
judge himself was reportedly detained and tortured by Saddam’s security
agents.

Rahman
took over the Saddam trial in January 2006 after previous incumbent
Razgar Amin was criticized for being lenient. A father of three, Rahman
was a graduate of Baghdad University’s school of law.

The Daily
Mail claimed that in March 2007, Rahman sought asylum in Britain. He
had travelled to UK with his family on a tourist visa. He had apparently
feared for his life. But there was no official confirmation of such an
asylum appeal.

…….

Link: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/Judge-who-ordered-Saddams-death-executed-by-ISIS/articleshow/37103790.cms

……

regards

?????

From a total outcaste to a favored friend and companion? We think this is fairly mad, but the liberal-left will probably be stunned by the audacity of change.  It was a fight to the death, a bold and brilliant gamble…and they lost out to a tsunamo….

At a political level this is simply a victory for the majority-Gujaratis and like minded American browns, who stood behind their tea-server boy and watched proudly as the bird spread its wings. That is the Hindu truth and we live in a Hindu land for now and forever.

It is interesting (and significant) that such letters are usually written in bipartisan spirit. This exception points to (a) deep R-D polarization in Washington, and/or (b) discomfort amongst Ds with such a blatant u-turn so fast. 

The most important question remains: what will Hilary think (or do)?
………..
Two
American lawmakers have written to US House Speaker John Boehner
requesting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi be invited to address a
joint meeting of Congress in September when he travels to Washington at
President Barack Obama’s invitation.




“India is a critical
partner of the United States. In every aspect, whether it be in
political, economic, or security relationship, the United States has no
more important partner in South Asia,” Congressmen Ed Royce [Republican from California-39] and George
Holding [Republican from North Carolina-13]
wrote in their June 20 letter to the House Speaker, echoing
Obama’s oft-cited statement that US-India relationship will be one of
the defining partnerships of the 21st century.

Royce
and Holding said the US must now work closely with Modi to strengthen
the relationship given that he has promised to focus on private
enterprise, reduce bureaucracy, and strengthen trade ties with major
partners. Since 2001, US-India trade has experienced impressive growth,
but our commercial relationship remains far below the scale of our
markets, they said.

Royce, a California Republican who is
chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee and former co-chair of
the India Caucus, has been a ardent votary of a Washington outreach to
Modi
even as some of his colleagues worked to keep the former Gujarat
chief minister out of the US in view of his alleged inaction during the
2002 Gujarat riots. The State Department complied with the pressure from
a few lawmakers and their human rights constituents.

…All
that is now in the past after the White House, pilloried for allowing
the India relationship to drift, initiated a policy turnabout,
ostensibly impressed by the mandate the Indian electorate gave the
Modi-led BJP. Efforts are now on to reset the relationship amid the
discovery in Washington of Modi’s many perceived strengths and virtues.

……..
…….

Link: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/American-lawmakers-want-Narendra-Modi-to-address-US-Congress/articleshow/36911669.cms

…….

regards

Madam President (2B) speaks her mind

No blow-jobs please…..“It’s like keeping poisonous snakes in your backyard
expecting they will only bite your neighbor”….

defensive……Mind your own business lady pakistan can handle this situation we do not
need any lectures from you…..

imaginative…..One thing seems clear here is that a US-India block and a Pak-Russia block is in the making…..
pragmatic…..She is going to be the next President of the USA. Better pay heed now or the relationship will really go south….

Hilary is supposedly a friend of India. But that was in the good old, pre-Hindu-Brotherhood days. She is definitely a liberal imperialist, and probably takes the Carlotta Gall line on Pakistan (USA is fighting the wrong enemy etc.). At any rate, the reactions are predictable to say the least.

Given how America and her best friends and allies behave (and talk), it is probably a good idea for all parties to step back, reduce expectations and keep a friendly and respectful distance. 

In that sense, the India-USA relationship is probably just at the right temperature, not too hot and not too cold. In the meantime there needs to be strengthening of people to people links. Start with small steps: encourage more direct flights between India and USA (why not?).
………
Former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has said that
Pakistan’s policy of seeking strategic depth in Afghanistan has been
proven wrong and the country now needs to focus all its strength on
dealing with the militants.

“Their idea, that they have
these groups to provide strategic depth, as they like to say, vis-a-vis
Afghanistan, or vis-a-vis India, I think if that were ever true, which I
doubt, but if that were ever true, it no longer is,” she told Indian
NDTV channel.

….
In the interview that focused on her new book,
‘Hard Choices’, Ms Clinton said that Pakistan also needed to make a hard
choice now, disconnecting its ties to various terrorist groups and
putting together all state powers to “once and for all go after
extremists, shut down their training camps, their safe havens, (and)
madressahs that are inculcating suicide bombing behaviour.” 

The Pakistanis must also “begin to have a different view of themselves in the future”, she added.
Ms
Clinton said she believed the Asif Zardari government did not know what
the connections were between elements within the military and the ISI
and various extremist and even terrorist groups.


She also said
that those were under the mistaken view that having these kinds of
proxies vis-a-vis India, vis-a-vis Afghanistan were in Pakistan’s
interests.

“It’s like keeping poisonous snakes in your backyard
expecting they will only bite your neighbour and what we are seeing now
is the continuing threat to the state of Pakistan by these very same
elements.”

….
Ms Clinton said that when she visited India after the
Mumbai terror attacks, she was “very struck” by how the then government
said it was very difficult to exercise restraint. “I don’t think any
government could say anything differently.”


She said when Sonia
Gandhi and former Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh conveyed the news
of the Mumbai terror attacks to her, she told them: “This is an element
within the military intelligence institutional base, but that the
civilian government was not involved.
But I think that no country can
turn away from that kind of attack continuously.”

….
She noted that
the terrorists now had moved deeper inside Pakistan, attacking targets
in major Pakistani cities. “We’ve just seen the attacks in Karachi. And I
don’t see how Pakistan can ignore this much longer.”

Asked who
she thought was accountable for the terror attacks, she said: “We
certainly never had any evidence that it went to the very top, but that
may or may not be true.”

……..

Link: http://www.dawn.com/news/1114535/pakistan-needs-to-make-hard-choices-now-hillary

……

regards

Brown Pundits