And Why We Use the Word “We”. A BP Precedent Post (our 40th one).
We begin with the constitutional question. Why is BP’s editorial voice plural?
“We” depersonalises the view. A plural voice separates the ruling from the individual. When a comment is moderated, a post is Precedented, or a thread is steered, the call is not a private preference dressed up as authority. It is the house speaking, on the record, under rules that must survive this case and govern the next.
200 a Day
Daily comment volume has risen sharply and is now nudging 200. Active commentators have expanded from a handful to around twenty. Removal rates are running at an estimated ten to twenty percent of all comments. The more we prune, the faster the diversity of commentators grows.
The BP Factions
The volume split is even between factions, roughly a third each across Crescent, Saffron, and Centre. The roster is not. Saffron voices number nearly twice the Crescent bench, with the Centre slightly behind.
Why Pruning Opens the Space
It gives the silent reader the confidence to speak without being buried by the loudest entrant. Quiet voices appear when the loudest hit limits.
Why Precedent Posts
Precedent Posts perform the same work across time. They extend moderation beyond the moment, so that settled questions do not have to be re-litigated on every thread. A Precedent is a “we” carried forward. Without Precedents, every argument resets daily. With them, a forum accumulates judgment, memory, and standards.
Precedents as New Content
The system does more than moderate. It writes.
Each time BP commits a position on a niche but recurring question (Kashmir is not Palestine., Why Balochistan is not Kashmir), a Precedent enters the record. Over time those reference points become something larger than a thread. They become a working archive of contested Punditry, reaching back eighty years, and further, to 1857. The Indian Mutiny. Or rather, in a case of mini-precedence, heretofore referred to as the First War of Indian War of Independence.
Mainstream outlets rarely have the patience for such questions. Academia touches them slowly and in expensive monographs. Social media treats them as slogans. A space that sits between those worlds, run on Precedent rather than reaction, produces content that is genuinely novel on the open internet.
The Founders’ Stake

As Founders, our interest is the interest of Brown Pundits. We want this space to grow because we want it to outlast the tastes, moods, vanities, and factions of those who run it, including our own.
Kabir and Sbarrkum, the most veteran commentators on this site along with Girmit, are now leaving records to posterity. Others will join. That continuity matters. It is older than any single post, any single founder, any traffic spike.
Beyond Crescent or Saffron, we Centre the space itself.

Max Amini an Iranian heritage well known standup comedian, specially in the US.
He seems to want regime change and says “no point in negotiating with a govt (Iranian) that is not cohesive or reliable”. Goes on to say is the “Is the Iran govt a healthy Entity to stay in that country is that good for the world; Absolutely Not””.
I suspect that is the view of Diaspora Iranian, some who even want the Monarchy (Reza Pahlavi) to return. Of course there are those who are hypocritical and not honest. eg Our resident Diaspora Iranian who claimed to be a Zionist
I guess this comment will be deleted, as some dont like the truth
https://web.facebook.com/reel/1205347864838380
We are half-Iranian; our views are pretty clear. Restoration of the Monarchy to the current setup (Velayat-e-Faqih stays and evolves).
We have written on this.
We are proudly Zionist as well but we also believe in a full and fair Palestinian Right of Return (Bi-Nationalism). Palestinians must be restored to their pre-Nakba homes and lands and property and compensated as well.
Aha finally an honest declaration
a) Restoration of the Monarchy
b) We are proudly Zionist
we also believe in a full and fair Palestinian Right of Return
That is not the Zionist position
Incidentally who is the “WE”, Iranian Diaspora?
The Zionist agenda has not changed
“We are waiting for the green light from the U.S., first and foremost, to complete the elimination of the Khamenei dynasty and to return Iran to the dark and stone ages by destroying Iran’s major energy and power facilities,” Katz said.
“This time, our strikes will be different and more deadly, and will deliver further devastating blows to the most painful places, which will shake and collapse the regime’s foundations,” he added.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/israel-waiting-us-greenlight-renew-iran-war-new-targets-marked-says-katz
terrible; Israel should not be threatening families
Zionist Agenda
[…] X.T.M on We Are Now Hitting 200 Comments a Day […]