Adonis: “Islam Cannot be Modernized”

Adonis is probably right about “classical Islam”, the Islam of the 4 Sunni and 1 Shia school that is regarded as canonical by most of the world’s Muslims (most of whom, of course, have little or no idea about the details of said Islam, but honor it in principle). That Islam developed such superb self-defense mechanisms: apostasy and blasphemy memes borrowed from Christians and Jews perhaps, but refined and perfected to the point where they are to be enforced by the democratic will of the masses (i.e. by free lance executioners and mobs) and are therefore near-impossible to reform by diktat from above. But at the same time, one must (on the grounds of “common sense”) reject the possibility that ANY human institution can escape the weaknesses and strengths of human biology and culture. Culture evolves, so do bodies and brains. Change will come (and has always been coming); even among Muslims, the vast majority do not seem to practice slave trading or the sex-slavery of concubines (even though it is explicitly permitted by the 5 classical schools), so this just means there is a lag (perhaps of centuries, but certainly not infinite) between the change in everyday practice and the change in legal and theological texts. The first step was taken long ago: ignore half of them. The second step (explicitly renounce them) is awaiting weakening of the apostasy and blasphemy memes. And changes in the “relations of production and the means of production” have already undermined them too. It is a matter of time. (I kid my Marxist friends. I actually don’t know if means and relations of production are the decisive factor or not; but I do know that the times, they are a changing..)
http://www.dw.com/en/syrian-poet-adonis-hits-back-at-criticism-over-german-peace-prize/a-18691869
http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2012/jan/27/adonis-syrian-poet-life-in-writing

http://www.banipal.co.uk/contributors/504/adonis/

The Syrian poet Adonis is probably the most famous living Arabic poet. He

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/19/islam-cant-be-modernised-says-worlds-greatest-arabic-poet/

The writer regarded as the greatest Arabic language poet alive today has said Islam cannot be modernised.

Adunis Asbar, known by his pen name Adonis, is a Syrian-born writer often considered one of the greatest living poets of the Arabic language. He has come under criticism for comments he made recently about Islam before receiving the Erich Maria Remarque Peace Prize, named after the famous pacifist and author of the classic World War One novel ‘All Quiet on the Western Front’.

In an interview with Die Welt he talked about one of the most pressing issues in Germany since the migrant crisis began, the idea of being able to integrate migrants from predominately Muslim countries into European societies.

Being raised a Muslim himself and having one of the greatest understandings of the language of the Quran, Adonis said: “You can not reform a religion. If they are reformed, [the original meaning] is separated from it. Therefore, modern Muslims and a modern Islam is already impossible. If there is no separation between religion and state, there will be no democracy especially without equality for women. Then we will keep a theocratic system. So it will end.”

Laying down a heavy critique of the Islamic world, he added: “Arabs have no more creative force. Islam does not contribute to intellectual life, it suggests no discussion. It is no longer thought. It produces no thinking, no art, no science, no vision that could change the world. This repetition is the sign of its end. The Arabs will continue to exist, but they will not make the world better.”

The remarks are in reference to the broader questions of how he sees the Middle East, and specifically his native Syria which has been in a state of civil war for years. Adonis describes the totality of Islam in the life of people in the Islamic world saying Muslim society is “based on a totalitarian system. The religion dictates everything: How to run, how to go to the toilet, who one has to love
”

Initially seemingly reluctant to condemn the Assad regime, he did write an open letter to Bashar Assad asking him to step down. However, this also angered rebel sympathisers when he referred to Assad as the elected President of Syria. Adonis said: “But I’ve also written a second letter, which was addressed to the revolutionaries. I have asked for their vision. But they would not read it, because they are not independent.”

He went on to say the rebels were controlled by interests in America, Saudi Arabia and certain sections of Europe, and stessed:

“I have long been an opponent of Assad. The Assad regime has transformed the country into a prison. But his opponents, the so-called revolutionaries, commit mass murder, cut people’s heads off, sell women in cages as goods and trample human dignity underfoot.”

Adonis was referring to the Islamic State and the Al-Nusra front (an Al Qaeda affiliate) who have become the largest opposition force to Assad over the course of the civil war.

Breitbart London has already reported that attempts to house and integrate Muslim migrants will cost Germans and other European countries billions of euros, and according to Adonis’ opinion it could be a useless endeavour.

When asked if he receives death threats from radical Islamists Adonis said: “Of course, but I do not care. For certain convictions people should risk their lives.”

Asian Americans: Model Minority, POC or just a bad idea?

Razib Khan has a post up about Asian Americans and how they are perceieved/presented in American intellectual discourse.
Facts are important. But they can be inconvenient….. Today Quartz put up a piece, If Asian Americans saw white Americans the way white Americans see black Americans, which is not really about Asian Americans at all, but simply uses them as a prop, often in a mendacious manner. First, it gives a nod to the Asian American “Model Minority Myth,” stating that there is “perception that they are high achievers relative to other American ethnic groups.” Get it? There’s a perception. There’s a myth in some scholarly and political quarters that the model minority idea is a myth, founded mostly on assertion (e.g., just stating that it’s a false myth) and slicing and dicing the statistics to emphasize ways in which Asian Americans are disadvantaged in relation to non-Hispanic whites. For example, there is often a focus on the diversity among Asian Americans, ranging from affluent Indian Americans, to groups with more conventional socioeconomic profiles like Filipinos, and finally, those which are somewhat disadvantaged such the Hmong. This is to show that Asian Americans are not a model minority
some of them are struggling. But the logic is not applied to whites! Those who purport to debunk the myth of the model minority would not accede to debunking the idea of white privilege by pointing to the state of Appalachia, and rural white America more generally. Group averages for we, but not thee?


 And yet the Quartz piece engages in some interesting jujitsu by actually reporting the statistics of Asian American advantage vis-a-vis white Americans in the service of a broader agenda of putting whites in their place in relation to their critiques of black Americans. In particular it quotes Anil Dash as saying “If Asian Americans talked about white Americans the way whites talk about black folks, they’d bring back the Exclusion Act.”


This to me is really bizarre, and why I term the piece mendacious: Asian Americans do talk about white Americans the way whites talk about black folks. This sort of thing was a clear subtext of Amy Chua’s Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. Many (most?) Asian American kids who grew up with immigrant parents were barraged with assertions about the disreputable character of their “American” (white) friends, and how it was important to keep on the straight & narrow. Immigrants from Asia often perceive white Americans to be sexually obsessed, lazy, and prone to a general amorality and fixation on short term hedonic interests. These are polite ways to condense the sort of attitude many Asian immigrants have toward the white American mainstream, which they worry will absorb and corrupt their children. Dash must know this, as he probably had immigrant parents, or was friends with people from immigrant backgrounds. Most white Americans don’t know this, partly because most white Americans don’t have non-white friends. But anyone from an Asian American background would be aware of the stereotypes and perceptions.


The tacit misrepresentation of Asian Americans here, not acknowledging that they do engage in the exact sort of behavior you are hypothetically positing they might engage in and so alienate white people, is not surprising. Asian Americans are often simply bit characters in a drama involving broader social and political streams which dominate the political landscape.,, 

Read the whole thing there..

I am posting this because I have often wondered why some Asian-American intellectuals (and more specifically, “South Asian” ones, since I am a little more familiar with them) are so committed to a model in which the model minority is a myth and Asian-Americans are “people of color”, standing shoulder to shoulder with African-Americans and Latinos in POC-solidarity against the oppressive rule of White privilege? I don’t mean to say that there is NO truth in any such model. But leaving the truth and untruth of the assertion aside for the moment.

Arundhati Roy

  
Arundhati Roy was born in Shillong, Meghalaya to a Keralite Syrian Christian mother and a Bengali Hindu father, a tea planter by profession.
She won the Booker Prize in 1997 for her first novel The God of Small Things. Her views on many issues has rubbed many Indians the Wrong way

Roy on Kashmir

Roy says Kashmir has never been an integral part of India- a historical fact as per her.
 .

Roy on Big Dams
Roy on Maoists
Roy on RSS
Roy on Taliban
Roy on Capitalism

Geopolitical Analysis is bunk

In so many ways I’ve been reading the various back-and-forths on the various conflicts of the world.

What has dawned on me that most opinions on society

Russell Brand is a disaster

We’re all hypocrites, after all hypocrisy is the thin line between our reality and ideals except that some of us are more hypocritical than others.

Thankfully the Establishment dislikes Russell Brand more than it does Nigel Farage. I don’t find either to have any leadership qualities, thankfully in our Constitutional Monarchy the Crown remains

Blasphemy meme devours it’s own. JJ, Aamir Liaqat and chickens coming home to roost…

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=757798050941853&fref=nf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WqY–1wYR8

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bws9j_maulana-tariq-jameel-gets-emotional-on-blasphemy-case-registered-against-junaid-jamshed_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bnggt_maulana-tariq-jameel-response-on-junaid-jamshed-s-controversial-remarks-on-bibi-aisha-r-a_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bk2gz_junaid-jamshed-apologizes-for-his-remarks-about-hazrat-ayesha_webcam

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bo3yc_dr-aamir-liaquat-fahash-remarks-against-junaid-jamshed-s-mother_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2book9_amir-liaquat-after-junaid-jamshed-telephoned-him-and-explained-his-position-on-controversial-remarks_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bogbg_junaid-jamshed-ko-galiya-denay-walay-amir-liaquat-ka-asli-chehra-daikhay_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2boa9h_mufti-naeem-s-statement-and-clarification-in-favour-of-junaid-jamshaid_news

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bohvk_%D9%85%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AF-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AD%D8%A8-%D9%86%D9%82%D8%B4%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AF%D8%B8%D9%84%DB%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C-%DA%A9%DB%8C-%D8%B7%D8%B1%D9%81-%D8%B3%DB%92-%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D9%88%DA%BA-%DA%A9%D9%88-%D9%85%D9%86%DB%81-%D8%AA%D9%88%DA%91-%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%A8_news

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqpCZ3cgxvc (the original hadith)

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2btf95_another-controversial-statement-by-junaid-jamshed_news

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqpCZ3cgxvc (17 minute point, ahmed raza)

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21i5p2_tableeghi-tariq-jameel-ka-latest-kufr-2014_shortfilms

Things Will Get Worse..

As everyone knows by now, the French magazine Charlie Hebdo was been attacked by Jihadist terrorists this morning. 12 people are dead. As of the time of writing, the terrorists are still at large (which tells you a lot about the difficulties even a well-prepared city faces in tackling such attacks. The French are hardly amateurs at counter-terrorism). My friend Abbas Reza, chief editor at 3quarksdaily, wrote

http://www.dawn.com/news/1155650

Salman Rushdie just tweeted:
Religion, a medieval form of unreason, when combined with modern weaponry becomes a real threat to our freedoms. This religious totalitarianism has caused a deadly mutation in the heart of Islam and we see the tragic consequences in Paris today.
I stand with Charlie Hebdo, as we all must, to defend the art of satire, which has always been a force for liberty and against tyranny, dishonesty and stupidity.
‘Respect for religion’ has become a code phrase meaning ‘fear of religion’. Religions, like all other ideas, deserve criticism, satire, and, yes, our fearless disrespect.’
Embedded image permalink
Brown Pundits