There was an old man I knew in 1990. In exile in Jammu he became senile and kept shouting: take me to Mattan naag (spring), take me to Mattan spring (near his home) +
— Rahul Pandita (@rahulpandita) November 15, 2018
A Kashmiri pandit shares a story about his family’s tragic exile. It just makes me wonder what was India’s end-goal on J&K especially with regard to the Valley.
Also an amazing thread on the Deoband-Barelvi dynamics (interesting both are from the Urdu heartland imported into the Punjab)
This is exceedingly depressing. Shame on all the British officials involved. https://t.co/FT45DfnqtZ
— Jonathan Boone (@Jon_Boone) November 15, 2018
Karma is such a bitch.
Pakistan has done everything in its power to erase the Indianness off of its history and culture. Yet, two things that continue to define what Pakistan is today are derived from two little towns in India that even Indians probably know little about.
— Swat Swag (@NaPoha_) November 15, 2018
Of course Britain is in the midst of Brexit convulsions so at the moment I’m more of a “Brexit Pundit.”
As an interesting aside since we were discussing about skin colour earlier; it’s so evident to see the well-groomed lean and Normanesque Tory MPs set off against the portly Anglo-Saxonish Labour members. I know it’s difficult to quantify somehow but the ghost of the Normans is so evident in the social classes of England.
As for skin colour in the Subcontinent I think we have 3 divisions.
(1.) The AASI’s, which are sort of co-equivalent to the Negritos and Anadamese Islanders (one of the first coastal waves out of Africa that somehow also ended up in the Amazon). It’s interesting that they are substrate to every South Asian population (I think there are trace amounts in Central Asia, Afghanistan and even Iran).
(2.) the “Dravidian” farmers out of Iran. They are probably related to the J1/J2 types and might be an olive skinned population. Prominent in Sindh and Southern Pakistan through to South India (high % in Gujarat – must have been a locus of some sort).
(3.) our beloved Aryans who are especially prevalent among Brahmins, the Punjab and Haryana (though arguably the Haryanvis and East Punjab descend from Scythians to some extent). These look “European” but it’s a very different look to #2.
The Aryans are conventional European (light eyes, light hair, white skin) the ancient Dravidians would have (probably) looked like Middle Easterners (olive skin, dark hair dark eyes) and the AASI looks like Papua New Guineans.
Of course India being an ancient region these populations have all compounded to varying degrees but it explains why the Pathans & Brahmins look European but the Sindhis (Muslims mainly/ Sindhi Hindus are Punjabi Khatri migrants) and Gujarati (non Brahmin) have a browner Olive look.