The Muslim Districts That Hold West Bengal Up

West Bengal Hindus have a real grievance, and it should be stated plainly. East Bengal’s Hindu share fell from 28% in 1941 to under 8% in the 2022 Bangladesh census. West Bengal’s Muslim share rose from 19.85% in 1951 to 27% in the 2011 Census, and is estimated higher today.

The Nehru–Liaquat Pact of 1950 was meant to be reciprocal. It was not. One side kept its minorities; the other did not. Three refugee waves, 1950, 1964, 1971, landed on West Bengal alone. The frustration is not communal; it is actuarial.

But the conclusion drawn from it is often wrong. The three Muslim-majority border districts, Murshidabad, Malda, Uttar Dinajpur, are not a demographic problem to be solved. They are the reason the state functions.

Murshidabad holds the Bhagirathi offtake at Jangipur and the Farakka Barrage beyond it. Farakka diverts the Ganga’s dry-season flow into the Hooghly; without that diversion, Kolkata Port silts up, the Hooghly becomes seasonal, and the salinity line marches inland into the 24 Parganas. Malda anchors the Sealdah–New Jalpaiguri trunk line and the rail spine to Assam; lose it and North Bengal is an island.

Uttar Dinajpur sits directly below the Siliguri Corridor and carries NH 27. These were not given to India by accident in 1947. Radcliffe overrode demography for infrastructure, and the engineering logic has only deepened since.

The Muslims of these districts are weavers, beedi workers, masons, farmers on the most fertile alluvium in eastern India. Murshidabad silk, Malda mangoes, the Farakka catchment; the productive base of three districts rests on a workforce the state would struggle to replace at scale.

Frustration is fair. Cession is not. The districts that look like the problem are the ones holding the system together.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bombay Badshah
5 hours ago

Also Murshidabad was the capital of the Bengal Subah thus placing all the capitals of the three big post Mughal Muslim states inside India (Lucknow and Hyderabad being the other two).

Considering what happened to the other two, I have to give kudos to the Nizam of Hyderabad. Flip-flopping allegiances between the Mughals, the Marathas and the British, the Nizams managed to maintain their control of Hyderabad for nearly 250 years and the ruling family still owns vast properties across Hyderabad, including the royal palaces.

The corresponding Awadhi and Bengali properties are owned by the respective state governments. And for that matter, the Mughal holdings in Delhi too.

El Khawaja
El Khawaja
5 hours ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

I don’t think bragging about invading and annexing the Deccan sultanate is a flex because Operation Polo was a genocide resulting in the killings of at least 20,000 Muslims and the exodus of many more. Even to this day majority of the Hyderabadi Muslims I meet in America (and there’s a large community of them) either only identify as Hyderabadi/Deccani and reject an Indian identity or they will call themselves Indian but emphasize their Hyderabadi Muslim identity, this is a pretty common phenomenon in Chicago and Texas from what I’ve seen first hand. They’ve still maintained a very independent identity despite the forceful annexation nearly 80 years ago.

Last edited 5 hours ago by El Khawaja
El Khawaja
El Khawaja
5 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Yeah it was really bad. Nehru even referred to the Turko-Persian influenced culture of the Hyderabadi Muslims as “alien” which then led to an exodus of many of them to Pakistan.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1089851

S Qureishi
S Qureishi
5 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

So basically in Hyderabad State, Hindu landlords were exploiting the peasants. Communist rebellion broke out against the Hindu landlords, Congress tactically supported it.. Landlords appealed to the Nizam to control the situation, Nizam’s Razakaars managed to put the rebellion down, Congress basically declared this was a Hindu genocide and used this as a pretext to take over Hyderabad and dethrone the Nizam, and do a Muslim genocide in the process.

Just the old play book, and they hide behind “secularism”

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  S Qureishi

Hyderabad is India’s. Kashmir is also India’s. Get over it.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

All right, I’ll just take a break for a while in general. Catch up on the IPL and movies.

Maybe I’ll even have some cricket/movie articles ready by then.

S Qureishi
S Qureishi
2 hours ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

You can keep Hyderabad, but we will take Kashmir, sooner or later. Thanks.

Bombay Badshah
1 hour ago
Reply to  X.T.M

India is already “almost” at 2x income differential (2x proper will be in a few years) and Pakistan is already more than 40% poorer than India (around 60-70%).

We are looking at 4-5x by mid century.

https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PPPPC@WEO/IND/PAK/BGD

A
Kabir
1 hour ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

Weren’t you just told not to mention Pakistan for ten days?

S Qureishi
S Qureishi
1 hour ago
Reply to  X.T.M

We promise to hold a referrendum once Pak army is in control of Srinagar. India has not done that and won’t do it, but Pakistan will.

Bombay Badshah
1 hour ago
Reply to  S Qureishi

’48 ’65 ’99

Mauka mauka
Mauka mauka

aaa
Last edited 1 hour ago by Bombay Badshah
Kabir
1 hour ago
Reply to  S Qureishi

Honestly, you’re also not helping.

Bombay Badshah
5 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

Hyderabadi Muslims were a minority in the majority Telugu Hindu state. Prior to Operation Polo there was a raging communist revolution undergoing there against the razakars. These included many Hyderabadi Muslims as well – Makhdoom Mohiuddin, Hassan Nasir (tortured to death in Lahore by Pakistani authorities later).

they will call themselves Indian but emphasize their Hyderabadi Muslim identity

Everyone in India does that despite religion or ethnicity. The Indian identity can exist alongside other identities.

either only identify as Hyderabadi/Deccani and reject an Indian identity

Considering they are Americans now, I don’t particularly care (just like I don’t care what Canadian Sikhs identify as). The ones in India are very much Indian including Mohammed Siraj.

649597576_1230310409301317_3715472129959348891_n
El Khawaja
El Khawaja
4 hours ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

In many ways Deccan was the inverse of Jammu&Kashmir, the latter had a Muslim majority with a Hindu ruler – both had different outcomes and held to different standards. Either way, Operation Polo was morally wrong and illegal and to this day it seems like the heritage Hyderabadi Muslim population hasn’t moved on.

Everyone in India does that despite religion or ethnicity. The Indian identity can exist alongside other identities.

Not really, when they say they’re not Indian or emphasize their Deccani/Hyderabadi Muslim identity they’re doing it as a protest or in a way to point out that they’re actually their ethnicity first before Indian. Other Indian groups don’t do that in America (except for Punjabis) they almost always emphasize that they’re Indian and often don’t mention their ethnic backgrounds.

You may not care what Sikhs or old stock Hyderabadi Muslims identify as today but you do claim their culture and heritage, so you can’t just appropriate just because you physically inherited the civilization they left behind, you have the remnants of it but not the soul.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

In many ways Deccan was the inverse of Jammu&Kashmir, the latter had a Muslim majority with a Hindu ruler – both had different outcomes and held to different standards.

One huge difference. Kashmiri Muslims under the National Conference fought on the side of India. Whatever happened afterwards doesn’t change that core fact of what happened in 1948.

Kashmir got partitioned according to who sided with whom. Gilgit Scouts and Muslim Conference got their areas included in Pakistan. Hindu Dogras under the Maharaja and Muslim Kashmiris under the National Conference got their areas included in India.

And another difference, both the Nizam and the Maharaja acceded to India.

You may not care what Sikhs or old stock Hyderabadi Muslims identify as today but you do claim their culture and heritage, so you can’t just appropriate just because you physically inherited the civilization they left behind, you have the remnants of it but not the soul.

The moment they left, they relinquished the claim. And India very much has the “soul” too. Sikhs and Hyderabadi Muslims in India outnumber those outside by a huge margin.

Kabir
5 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

There is a Hyderabadi restaurant in Lahore DHA called “Gadrung”. My family goes there quite regularly.

https://images.dawn.com/news/1193929/this-artist-is-reviving-family-heirloom-recipes-to-bring-hyderabadi-cuisine-to-lahore

Bombay Badshah
4 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

Interesting observation.

Here you pretend to not really know about Hyderabad.

One city in particular called Hyderabad in India

But then here you refer to your Hyderabadi acquaintances and call it by the name it was even before the Nizamate (or part of the Mughal Empire) – The Deccan Sultanate.

Is your animus towards Telugus/Dravidians partly because one of the “crown jewels” of the “Islamicate” passed over to them?

Of course, them overtaking desi identity in America much to Pakistanis’ chagrin is another.

Considering you live in the suburbs of Dallas, the recent Frisco events must have been also affecting the desi community.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Bombay Badshah
El Khawaja
El Khawaja
3 hours ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

Seems like I hit a nerve, why does it matter how I refer to the city as? You sound very sensitive.

Is your animus towards Telugus/Dravidians partly because one of the “crown jewels” of the “Islamicate” passed over to them?

I don’t have any animus towards south indians, definitely not more than your animus towards Pakistanis and Muslims. I don’t think there are any Islamicate “crown jewels” left in India. We live in the present and build for the future, Islamabad, Peshawar, Lahore, and Karachi are the new crown jewels. Pakistanis have historically referred to the country as Madina-e-Sani (The second Madina) because we’ve left the past behind and built a new cradle.

Of course, them overtaking desi identity in America much to Pakistanis’ chagrin is another.

Considering you live in the suburbs of Dallas, the recent Frisco events must have been also affecting the desi community.

They’re not really taking over any identity, like I’ve mentioned in the past Pakistanis don’t really identify or need the term desi anymore, it’s too broad a category and people are better informed about cultures now than when S Asians first started migrating here. Also our communities are quite distinct so that kind of overlap doensn’t happen irl. Even in Canada, the Pakistani community in Mississauga has carved out a distinct identity from the Punjabi Sikhs in Brampton despite both having much more in common, down here the delta is naturally even wider.

As for my location, I never stated where I live although if you wanna be a weirdo-stalker and pry IP addresses using authorship (As you did with Qureshi) then I guess that’s a choice you’ve made and I don’t expect much better from you given your track record. I hope Xack reflects on your creepiness because its not a good look for this blog as him and the other founders worked hard to build over years.

Kabir
3 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

Prying into where people live when they haven’t stated that information publicly is actually very creepy.

In one of his earlier incarnations, he got into my email.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Kabir
Bombay Badshah
3 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Yes, mistake on my part. But kind of explains his anathema to Telugus/Dravidians.

El Khawaja
El Khawaja
3 hours ago
Reply to  Kabir

Yeah it’s super creepy, noticed he did that with Qureshi as well. He should seriously be banned has he’s given death threat before and even written erotic literature about Pakistani women. This “Humza” character is a degen and a threat to society. Hope Xack looks into this, I think he’s gotten way too much leeway.

Last edited 3 hours ago by El Khawaja
Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

I apologize about that. That is a line I should not have crossed – regarding personal information.

El Khawaja
El Khawaja
2 hours ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

Apology not accepted.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I got carried away by today’s Dhurandharing.

Like before, I will respect this line. No personal attacks.

S Qureishi
S Qureishi
40 minutes ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I disagree with your labels about Hinduphobia. If we dislike some aspects of Hindu cultural and religious practises and point them out, it’s the same as many Hindus criticizing many cultural or religious practises of Islam. Apart from caste differences, I havent even criticized Hindu relgion at all, and mostly stuck to countering Hindu nationalism which is specifically anti-Islam.

As long as criticism is respectful, it should not be considered any type of phobia.

I feel many several commentators here openly blame and mock Islam, they equate people’s view points as Islamic view points and do not have any logical consistency, engaging more in emotional outbursts.

Last edited 39 minutes ago by S Qureishi
Kabir
2 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

Technically, it wasn’t a death threat. He said he’d hold a gun to my head not that he would kill me.

Sexualizing Muslim women is beyond disgusting. A similar post from a Muslim man sexualizing Hindu women would most probably have had much tougher consequences. I’ll leave it there.

More seriously, I’m quite worried about his identification with a fictional Bollywood character. This is not psychologically healthy. If it’s a bit, it’s gone too far and isn’t funny anymore.

The constant low-signal posting of pictures from “Dhurandhar” is also annoying.

But yes, if I were the Admin here, the sexualizing of Muslim women would have resulted in a permanent ban. For a Hindu man to write those words about Muslim women is absolutely unforgivable.

Bombay Badshah
3 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

Islamabad, Peshawar, Lahore, and Karachi are the new crown jewels

If these are the “jewels”, god save you.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Yes, I apologize about that. I crossed a line which I shouldn’t have.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I don’t think I can edit but I will scour my comments and send them to you.

El Khawaja
El Khawaja
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I don’t know you guys personally, only recently discovered this blog a few months ago. BB’s behavior is strange indeed, I don’t blame BrownPundits but I do think the blog should dissociate from this guy and all of his aliases/sock accounts.

Kabir
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Even if BB were banned, there are plenty of other people (RNJ, NDG) who present Indian nationalist views. The “Saffroniate” is bigger than one person.

You are the admin. The decision to ban an individual rests with you.

The constant anti Pakistani animus from BB rapidly grows tiresome. One can appreciate one’s own country without constantly denigrating someone else’s.

As far as I know, he’s never been to Lahore yet he goes on and on about how second rate Pakistani cities are. This is just one example. It’s gratuitous.

Also this claim that Pakistanis are “cosplaying” which has come up repeatedly is actually quite offensive. My grandmother was from Agra. I’m not “cosplaying” as anything. I believe Q is also Muhajir.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Thank you for your trust in me. No more personal attacks.

Bombay Badshah
2 hours ago
Reply to  El Khawaja

The “Islamicate” crown jewels will always be Hyderabad, Lucknow, Agra and most of all Delhi.

Pakistan has anyway lost to India alas; thus the Pakistanis have to constantly deprecate India and everything she stands for.

Your language is ours, your food is ours and the “crown jewels” are ours.

Most Pakistanis (citizen or otherwise) will never see the Taj Mahal.

Bombay Badshah
5 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Israel does not have Arabic as an official language.

US does not have Comanche, Iroquois etc as an official language either.

Not the same in India.

And that is just one aspect. Cuisine as we have been debating. And so much else.

You yourself have admitted the spirit is “mixed”. The land plus part of the spirit is a way stronger claim than just a part of the spirit.

maxresdefault
Brown Pundits
47
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x