I. The Cannes Frame
The clip is short and damning. Alia Bhatt walks the Cannes red carpet as L’Oréal’s global face, waving at a thicket of photographers who never quite lift their cameras.
Sanam Saeed arrives in a white peacock couture by Hussain Rehar, fifty artisans and 2,354 hours, a tribute to Shamim Ara that the photographers actually shoot. Rehar’s accompanying showcase at Château St George is titled Lahore: A Knot in South Asia’s Loom, sitting one cabinet over from Gucci and Roberto Cavalli. The title is doing the work.
Cannes 2026 was supposed to be Bollywood’s annual export ritual. Instead, Pakistanis slid past the L’Oréal machinery and produced the festival’s most discussed South Asian image.
II. Taste Without Empire
Pakistan and Iran are niche cultures with disproportionate taste. Both sit on the wreckage of two of the three gunpowder empires, the Safavid and the Mughal, and Pakistan in particular straddles the seam where Persianate aesthetics, Indo-Islamic craft, and Central Asian forms once moved as a single circulation. Zardozi, the sherwani: these are not nostalgic costume choices, they are inheritance from a world that ran from Lahore to Lucknow.
The Mughal court and the Safavid atelier produced these forms at industrial volume because they had state apparatus, court patronage, and continental trade routes behind them. When the political base disappeared, the forms continued as workshop craft and elite memory, but lost the infrastructure that turned beauty into power. Contemporary Pakistan and Iran inherit the workshop but without the Imperial scale of production.
III. The Post-Colonial Tax
When that inherited taste tries to reach a global stage, two things happen. First, it gets routed through the post-colonial frame, which is the only legible idiom the Western festival circuit grants brown creatives. Lahore: A Knot in South Asia’s Loom is, by all accounts, beautiful work, and we mean that. It is also a defensive framing, an argument made to a Parisian jury about the validity of one’s own existence. The Mughal court did not need this framing. The Safavid atelier did not need this framing. The framing is the tax.
Second, because the niche is genuinely niche, the moment never converts to mass. Sanam Saeed in Rehar couture generates a seventy-two hour viral cycle, and then yields the ground back to the L’Oréal ambassador she briefly displaced. The post-colonial loom flatters the artisan and starves the industry.
IV. After 1979: The Arabesque Turn
The deeper structural trap sits inside Islam itself. After the Iranian revolution and the parallel Saudi expansion of the same decade, the Persianate world stopped being the centre of Islamic high culture and became, even on its own terms, a province. The Arabesque turn means that Iran and Persianate Pakistan no longer have a religious bloc that promotes them as much. The Ummah, as it now organises itself, does not read peacocks. It reads Mecca, oil, and increasingly Dubai (if it can emerge from the present geopolitics). Persianate culture inside contemporary Islam is hierarchically a junior partner, and the partnership is thinning.
V. The Turkish Exit
The Turks took a different exit, and the contrast is instructive. Anatolia fused its nationalism with a European face, a NATO posture, and after Erdoğan, a neo-Ottoman religious project that still trades on European-facing institutional scale: defence industry, drone exports, Netflix-distributed historical dramas, the Diyanet network running mosques from Berlin to Lagos. Turkey is the working counterexample to the niche thesis, because it converted imperial inheritance into a mid-sized industrial state with cultural reach. It did so by partially exiting the Persianate, leaning into Turkic specificity, and accepting the European frame on its own terms.
Pakistan could not run the Turkish play. Its colonial inheritance was British, not Kemalist, and the 1947 settlement left no industrial spine equivalent to what Atatürk found in 1923 Anatolia. Iran could not run it either, because the 1979 revolution closed the European door deliberately and has spent forty-seven years calcifying that choice. The Turkish counterexample shows the niche trap is not inevitable. It also shows the price of the exit is the Nastaliq script, and neither Pakistan nor Iran has paid it.
VI. India and the Persianate Inheritance
That used to leave India as the natural absorbing market, because the Persianate flow into the subcontinent is a millennia old fact. It still leaves traces. The Indian upper class, genuinely astute, continues to mine Persianate and Mughal aesthetics for whatever serves: ghazal, gharara, biryani, Urdu cadence in Hindi cinema. The Hindu cultural mainstream has never had a real problem with Turkic or Persianate heritage. It has a problem with Islam. That distinction matters. The aesthetic strand gets quietly absorbed, rebadged as Indian, and shorn of its religious context. The religious strand is what gets contested, and increasingly excluded.
VII. The Bifurcation
What that produces is a bifurcation we should be honest about. Pakistan will remain a majority Muslim society organised around Persianate-Indic forms, with a thinning Hindu and Sikh substrate. Indian Muslims, particularly the upwardly mobile, will increasingly Hinduise their public register if they want to operate in the new Indian mainstream.
By “Hinduise” we mean something specific. Sanskritised vocabulary in professional and civic speech (Namaste replacing Adab, Bharat replacing Hindustan in formal contexts). Participation in Hindu civic festivals as social default rather than political statement. Second-generation name choices that read as neutral or Hindu rather than visibly Islamic. The quiet dropping of religious markers (beard, veil, conspicuous prayer in office) that previously functioned as everyday confession. None of this is forced. It is the price of mainstream legibility, and prices that are not forced are usually paid.
The shared Persianate substrate, which was the most plausible bridge between these populations, is being unbundled: the aesthetics annexed by Hindu India, the religion quarantined, the Pakistani and Iranian originators left holding a beautiful but stateless inventory.
VIII. Niche by Design
Hence the Cannes scene, and hence its limit. Pakistan and Iran turn westward because the West treats them like exotic blooms. The reception is real. It is also structurally niche. Hussain Rehar can sit beside Gucci and Cavalli for one week in May, he cannot route Pakistani textile production through the volume channels that turn taste into power. Iranian cinema wins at festivals and remains under sanctions.
The honest read is this. Taste without mass is a museum, not a civilisation. The Persianate world makes the most refined images in contemporary Asia and the slowest progress in converting them into anything resembling cultural leverage. Alia Bhatt vanishing from the frame for ninety seconds is not a sign that the script has flipped. It is a sign that the niche is functioning exactly as designed: briefly visible, easily reabsorbed, never scaled.
Sanam Saeed wore the peacock well but it will be Alia who is back next year.

I don’t think we should be setting up a competition between Sanam and Alia or between India and Pakistan.
I didn’t even know Sanam Saeed had walked the ramp at Cannes until I read the article in DAWN about how Pakistanis were pushing back on her being called “South Asian representation”.
I think the point is that the same Indians who want to claim biryani etc and deny that claim to Pakistan (we have seen some of this even on this forum) were quick to claim Sanam. She is obviously South Asian but at the same time she is clearly a Pakistani actress modeling for a Pakistani designer. This moment at Cannes is a big deal for Pakistan. Let us have our moment without jumping in.
North India and Pakistan obviously share a common culture. I, for one, don’t really have any issues with that. It’s a statement of the obvious.
who was actually claiming her?
See the following article:
https://images.dawn.com/news/1195308/pakistanis-have-a-lot-to-say-about-sanam-saeed-at-cannes-being-called-south-asian-representation
It was on Twitter/X apparently. Pakistanis were claiming “Pakistani representation” which Indians countered by saying “South Asian representation”. Which led one Pakistani commenter to retort “This is not a group project”.
I don’t really care if Indians want to claim Sanam is “South Asian”. I believe the term “South Asian” has a context. But it can’t be claimed selectively. When something is positive, they want to get on the bandwagon. When something is negative, they want to distance themselves from us.
I don’t think most Indians were tuned in to Cannes to even recognize Sanam Saeed but i think liberal Indian cohort may have tried to push “South Asian” framing. I am sure most people in the region prefer to be recognized by their nationalities instead of a CIA term South Asian.
E.g. –
Academic Freedom in South Asia Requires a Regional Canvas. Here’s Why {The wire article}
I agree with you that this was very much a niche issue on X/Twitter. Most Indians–and most Pakistanis for that matter–don’t really care about Cannes.
“South Asian” is very much a diaspora term. There’s nothing wrong with it. I have written extensively about the appropriate contexts in which it is used.
I do think it is hypocritical of (some) Indians who normally want to distance themselves from Pakistan to suddenly start claiming a Pakistani actress when Pakistan is having its moment in the sun.
The hypocrisy is what I’m interested in.
P.S. – We can avoid good chunk of hypocrisy issue by discarding the term South Asia.
I disagree. The term “South Asian” is a useful one in particular contexts. Obviously, you can choose not to use it but you can’t stop other people from identifying with it.
“South Asia” is not just India-Pakistan-Bangladesh but also includes Nepal, Sri Lanka and (according to some classifications) Afghanistan.
It is a regional classification just as “European” or “Middle Eastern” are.
I wrote an essay about it here:
https://kabiraltaf.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-south-asia
I am well aware of modalities but i prefer nationalities over regional categorization as if confuses rather than clarify things for the uninitiated.
Indian subcontinent over South Asia
The Indian subcontinent is a colonial term. It’s as outdated and absurd as the geographical term “Indo-China. Time to retire it.
Indo-China did reflect that SE Asia has been shaped by those two Civs. a Dharmic stronghold so to speak
Yeah but its no longer used, the term has been retired and isn’t considered archaic and so should “Indian subcontinent”,
Sri Lanka is not part of the “Indian subcontinent” but it is part of South Asia.
Afghanistan is not part of the “Indian subcontinent” but it is (according to some classifications) part of South Asia.
The terms are not equivalent and mean different things. One is a geographical term while the other is a geopolitical term.
This is not a particularly complicated concept to understand.
You cannot define words any way you please.
Here is Wiki:
Hopefully, we can agree that Wiki is not written by Pakistanis and is not inherently anti-Indian.
There is a difference between a geophysical and a geopolitical term.
I’ve made this point multiple times already but it doesn’t seem to get through to you.
+1
SL not part of the Indian Subcontinent is a first ..
SL is an island off the coast of the Indian subcontinent. Just as Britain is an island off the coast of Europe.
Ireland, which is the island off Britain, considers itself very much a part of Europe
Even Britain itself considers itself part of Europe, just not the European Union.
They have lost two consecutive finals at the Euros.
Again, geography is not arbitrary.
SL is an island. Do you understand the concept of “island”?
Ireland is part of the EU.
I am talking about geography. You can see the Wikipedia definition of “Indian subcontinent”.
Geographically, SL is an island off the coast of the Indian subcontinent.
I don’t need to get into some big debate about this. My larger point is that definitions are not arbitrary. We cannot just use whatever we feel like.
These concepts are very well-defined.
The British & Irish isles are considered to be a part of Europe.
The Palk straits are narrower and shallower than the English Channel.
The Palk Strait could almost be said to be a submerged land bridge. It’s called either Adam’s bridge or Ram’s bridge.
If SL is not a part of the Indian Subcontinent then it would have to constitute its own continent entirely (so would every other island on the planet).
When British people spoke of going to the “continent”, it was clear they meant mainland Europe.
I really don’t care that much either way. But the point remains that there is a standard geographical definition of what the “Indian subcontinent” is. Islands off the coast are not part of it.
Islands are not continents. The only one which is both is Australia.
The point–which as usual you miss– is that you cannot make up definitions as you please. “Indian subcontinent” is a well-defined term. SL is not a part of it. It is an island off the coast.
In your analogy, Madagascar is an island off the coast of Africa.
As long as you haven’t disclosed your educational credentials, I’m not having a conversation about who is “highly educated”.
You are free to prefer whatever you want.
You have no right to tell other people what terms they can or cannot identify with.
“South Asian” makes sense in particular contexts and people will continue to use it in those contexts.
🙂
An odd question; why does that matter here? I mean, this film festival is centred around you know films. It’s not like this is the Met Gala, whose main point is fashion. Unless either of them won something for a film they did in the last year, I am not really sure people outside of South Asia care about their clothing as much as they do about their filmography. I still remember Payal Kapadia won the Grand Prix at Cannes for “All we imagine as light,” and that was a meaningful achievement because she got an award at the film festival. I am trying not to be insulting or overly prideful here.
In my experience, this year is generally a shitty year for film and fashion. People were literally complaining about Coacella, Cannes, and the Met Gala since they are all being financed by conservative billionaires, including everyone’s favourite CEO, Bezos. That led to general boycotts and low viewership in some of these things. I doubt two actresses who come from privilege and have an air of nepotism are going to particularly impress upon a Western crowd in the middle of a complex class conflict between the working, middle, and upper classes.
Also, I don’t mean to be demeaning or sexist or something else, but this feels like the world’s smallest violin. Neither of these actresses is relevant outside of South Asia, and I don’t think this “controversy” even registered with anyone. In these contentious times, I doubt anyone is paying attention to this, and it feels like everyone in the subcontinent is blowing an insignificant issue into something big, which is really stupid. This whole thing seems really dumb.
As a side note, it honestly does not matter if this is South Asian representation or Pakistani or Indian or whatever else people want to argue about. No one outside of South Asia can really tell the difference between the different ethnic groups in South Asia. Most people here are fundamentally just a different shade of brown; people can’t even tell languages apart from each other. Outside of very niche urban circles and urban neighbourhoods, for most people (especially in rural regions), there is no fundamental difference. At this point, the first thing people hear about Pakistan is Osama bin Laden, terrorism, and being a conservative, “backward” (from their perspective) muslim country. The first thing people hear about India is pollution, poor waste management, and a conservative, “backward” country with rising Hindu ethonationalism (similar to yeh old ‘murica). That’s if they even bother to look things up, rather than going with the old stereotypes.
Quite frankly, I feel like I am losing brain cells just listening to this controversy, like really, this hill you (people in South Asia, not you specifically) are going to die on. Grand, people need to get better hobbies.
I actually agree with you. This whole thing is not that important.
I didn’t know Sanam Saeed was at Cannes until I read the DAWN article. What I thought was interesting was the controversy about Indians on Twitter wanting to claim her as “South Asian” when usually they want nothing to do with Pakistan.
See, I think this controversy is more of a one-sided issue since I don’t think it had the salience in the indian side as much. India’s media landscape is very fragmented into localized parts, like their specific part of the internet or news networks for Tamil speakers or Bhojpuri speakers. Most people engage with issues and topics relevant to their local region, while ignoring anything that happens outside their place. Quite frankly, most Indians are probably more insular, and the most they are willing to engage with might nearby state or interrelated people groups within the country.
This probably stems from the fact that most indians don’t really have much in common with people outside the country. Except for the Bengalis, Punjabis, the dwindling Sindhis, and the occasional Tamil interest in Lanka, there isn’t much cultural overlap for other groups in the neighbouring countries. Also, the term “South Asian” is never used in India since most of the Major ethnic groups are centred within India, and very rarely does it involve regions that exist outside of modern India. Everyone just uses the term Indian all the time for everything from culture to politics because other regions don’t appear in her mind at all. Maybe this might apply to Pakistan as well, but I am not familiar with the region or its internal politics.
Also, Twitter (and by extension, the English-speaking sections of the internet) don’t really reflect the overall social landscape. Even though internet access has increased in recent years, most of the new users generally gravitate to their specific language or subculture. Very few (if any) would gravitate to English-speaking parts and engage in these discussions. Another thing to keep in mind is that most of the main English (and to a certain extent Hindi) users generally come from the urban educated middle class, often upper caste and male (depending on the platform). This is like the main core electorate of the BJP and generally agrees with the ideological positions, including conservative talking points. Beyond the confines of this demography, it is hard to tell what the remaning peoples opinions on many topics are since the jingoistic and sensational nature of modern media obscures actual perspectives.
I definitely agree with you that this is a controversy on English speaking Twitter/X. It’s not that meaningful in a larger sense.
DAWN only picked it up because it was about Sanam Saeed–a major Pakistani actress.
“South Asian” as a term is not really used in Pakistan as well. It’s a diaspora term.
Here’s something I wrote about the term “South Asia” and the contexts in which it is appropriate:
https://kabiraltaf.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-south-asia
Again, not trying to feed this more because I agree with you – this is a complete waste of time but parts of this actually feel manufactured just like the apparent Indian RW trolling and hate of Arshdeep after he dropped some catches in a match against Pakistan. It took sometime for people to figure out those so-called Hindu RW handles were actually Pakistani bots.
Interesting yes – that does make sense
Does it surprise anyone that Sanam Saeed is more chic than Alia Bhatt? Bollywood and Indian cinema are a vortex of brainrot and lack the restraint to ever radiate true elegance. This has real consequences on the culture unfortunately. Not trying to attack India specifically, but large countries (India, China, USA, maybe Russia) tend to become victims of their own agglomerated media industries, that get rewarded for pandering to the lowest common denominator of a massive market. Taste may be subjective, but I always thought that guys in Lahore, Colombo and Kathmandu were noticeably better dressed than their peers in Delhi , Mumbai or Chennai. Yes, the Indian cities have strong outliers due to stratospheric wealth of late, but on average and controlling for wealth. Part of this is a consequence of how inward looking Indians are culturally. Pakistanis are more open, i can only assume because of belonging to a larger religious identity, to being influenced by other cultures aesthetically. Indians are happily oblivious to whether Hrithik Roshan or Karishma Kapoor have charisma that is truly universal (they don’t).
This may just be my algorithm or the fact that I hardly use any social media other than X/Twitter but this “outrage” doesn’t really seem at all to be cornering any space of the Indian mindspace today. I also agree with Girmit. Indian masses tend to be quite insular like many other large countries and woefully unaware of global trends and relevance. Interestingly, the not so insignificant educated now seem to be acknowledging and calling it out.
https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2026/05/cannes-bollywood-and-the-illusion-of-universal-fame/
Separately, what has occupied significant attention in dark recesses of social and other media I tend to inhabit is actually quite mainstream and rather explosive
https://theprint.in/diplomacy/cypher-leak-imran-khan-pakistan-army-us-role-that-changed-everything-in-islamabad-beyond-ctc/2935252/
I understand the Pakistani crescentiate wouldn’t want to bring any attention to this for obvious and previously stated reasons but this also leads credence to my theory that Munir is more a Manchurian candidate than a Marshal and – that Pakistan’s rising star with the West is not a result of Op. Sindoor but rather Op. Sindoor/Pahalgam were just the latest exhibit of a decades old cycle that Pakistan enjoys of becoming geopolitically useful. Being the one-track mind that the Pakistani security establishment is, it doesn’t miss a chance to use any new found strength to provoke and cause harm to India. Here’s hoping (most likely in vain) this doesn’t lead to another Pahalgam type incident some time soon.
‘South Asian’ is more a Pakistani or an ignorant diaspora thing anyway. Not at all something that most Indians would ‘claim’. Never heard of this Samaa lady until I saw Kabir frantically whinging about her being ‘appropriated’.
On ‘Cipher-gate’, is this really news of any kind. All of us on BP and most Pakistanis know that their politics is simply kabuki with PakMil essentially controlling strings. And they in turn are compromised with varying degrees from Uncle Sam, Uncle Cheen and Uncle Saud. Immy was …. foolishly arrogant about his own limitations and managed to rub 2 if not all 3 of the uncles the wrong way. And was promptly booted off the ceremonial PM chair.
In fact, the only thing surprising about the Imran saga is the fact that he’s managed to stay alive all this long. I thought his popularity amongst the masses would mean that PakMil couldn’t pull off its usual template of exile/imprisonment. I legit expected them to release sleazy videos of him, and then him suffering an ‘accidental drug overdose’. Happy to see that hasn’t happened. But on the flip side, it just demonstrates the degree to which the Pakistani awaam has just bent over and accepted its fate completely at the mercy of an unelected self-appointed praetorian kleptocratic organization.
By some accounts, he is going through a fate almost as bad as death. Apparently his conditions are quite bad and he’s not being offered appropriate healthcare. Things are so bad several contemporaries of IK signed a petition to make an appeal for better treatment – this was led by Greg Chappell.
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/terrible-what-they-are-doing-to-him-chappell-gavaskar-border-waugh-make-humanitarian-appeal-for-imran-khan-20260217-p5o30i.html
Never heard of this Samaa lady until I saw Kabir frantically whinging about her being ‘appropriated’.
Couldn’t agree more. The first and only place I’ve seen this is BP lol.
Looks like Indian news cycle is running dry these days so they need to invent new conspiracies. There is nothing new in the recent cipher reslease that was not already public knowledge.
Everyone knew the US, EU, Saudi, UAE were extremely unhappy with Imran Khan’s foreign policy direction. Pak Mil usually decides Pakistani foriegn policy and large sections of it were unhappy with the direction Imran was heading.
The reason why IK was removed was because of the appointment of the army chief was due in 7 months, who is constitutionally selected by the PM and IK wanted to instal his own guy who would have then destroyed the opposition. It’s as simple as that, nothing deep.
We are under no illusion that the Pak military establishment calls the most important shots in the country. I don’t understand why Indians think this is something worth mocking, seeing India is still third world after 80 years of full democracy.
After the thrashing Pak military gave India last year, Imran Khan’s fortunes have fallen flat. While he stills remains popular, most people don’t think he was offering anything new as his 3.5 year tenure was pretty unremarkable. The only reason he got so popular was because people thought the army and other politicians were corrupt and unpatriotic .. however all that changed after May 2025.
IK was offered amnesty in exchange to sit tight but he refused so he sits in jail biding his time. He also refused to talk to his political opponents let alone ally with them, leaving them with no option but to support his continued incarceration. His best course of action is to wait for a split between the current government and the Military establishment.
From an Indian perspective, one can be…benignly indifferent to who or what rules over Pakistan. But that’s wishful thinking. Its precisely the internal political machinations and power dynamics within Pakistan, that create the perverse incentives for a Pahalgam, Pathankot or a 26/11.
Its ok, you can keep believing you “won”. 🙂 Just like the previous conflicts between India-Pak. Your kids someday will acknowledge the facts just like you accept 1971.
Oh really? Suddenly the army isn’t corrupt after May 2025? An actual patriotic Pakistani would see the direct corelation between the Pakistani army’s domestic perception crisis, and then Pahalgam occurs. Also how the aftermath was cynically and swiftly used by Pak Mil to bend over the Pakistani political structures to solidify the control of PakMil and Sieg Heil Phailed Marshall.
But hey, some tribal mutations of patriotism require stubborn denial of facts and repeated assertions of supremacy. Its ok. 🙂
After India killed over 100 Pakistani civilians – mostly women and children- in an unprovoked attacked on May 6-7 2025, it’s a bit rich talking about Pahalgam attack. There is no discussion currently happening in Pakistan about Pahalgam, Balakot, 26/11, 15/08 or whatever other justifications you need to attack Pakistan.
The Pakistan army is quite corrupt, but most people know that it’s still our army that keeps the hordes to the east and the west at bay. This is the unfortunate reality and most of us are fine with it. May 2025 was just a demonstration of that. The world saw who won or lost, but we are fine with whatever you think man.
“seeing India is still third world after 80 years of full democracy”
I mean, Pakistan isn’t even that?
Total Sub-Saharan African tier fourth world country.
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/SSQ/PAK
Welcome back!
.
Looks like “vanvaas” didn’t change a thing.
Back to his old tricks as usual.
Being the one-track mind that the Pakistani security establishment is, it doesn’t miss a chance to use any new found strength to provoke and cause harm to India. Here’s hoping (most likely in vain) this doesn’t lead to another Pahalgam type incident some time soon.
Pahalgam took place because the PTI anti-military agitation had genuinely shaken the ‘roots’ of Pakistani military’s unquestioned supremacy and popularity domestically. Given Munir’s rapid roll up and consolidation of power – “field marshal for life”, “lifetime immunity”, “constitutional authority” beyond his base tenure etc – for now, I think the cost-benefit equation, even for PakMil does not indicate them risking a round 2. But that calculus can and unfortunately likely will change at some point.
I found this news interesting. Surprised that nobody on BP caught it:
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/india/trump-says-india-pak-ceasefire-was-a-favour-to-asim-munir-and-shehbaz-sharif-13920850.html
He was talking about the US/Israel-Iran ceasefire. This is both asinine and irresponsible commentating on your part.
Not talking about this particular event: Indian vs Pakistani female divergence does boil more down to modern Islamic vs Hindu restrictions, and less to do with Mughals or any empires.
Indian clothing uses more brighter colors, plus they are also more prone to show more curves or skin. The problem is that while this appears more authentic, it has not evolved with the times, because the Indian elite has mostly westernized so they are not setting new trends in local clothing – at least not to the level they should be.
The Pakistani trend is to demphasize brighter colors in favor of pastels with a more soothing look, and since the dress cannot show curves or skin, they really have to rely on the intricacy of design.This is a result Islamic conservatism which has regulated the clothing, and the Pakistani elite still has not abandoned it. It’s also less Punjabi culture (which historically uses more brighter colors) The top women’s brands are all based in Karachi (especially the old ones) and Lahore only recently caught up to it in the last decade or so.
Also, I have not seen much Iranian female fashion but whenever I have they are all western coded and a slightly more conservative verion of Turkey.
Only South Asians have kept the tradition going here.
I almost completely agree with you here. Indian elites (in this case Bollywood) are wannabe Anglo-Americans anyway. That said, we do have lots of subaltern (is that a correct term here?) who are doing some funky stuff and reimagining Indian clothing. I only know this because my wife shared a few influencers from small town India doing great things with indigenous clothing.
Yes India is complex – we should write on Bollywood
Yes, there are some pretty cool labels coming out of small town India. They aren’t afraid to be themselves and end up being truer to the local culture that shape attire specific to the region.
I’ve always found that our traditional weavers are the best designers on the planet.
There’s a growing class of discerning buyers who prefer that authenticity and class over loud designer labels.
[…] RecoveringNewsJunkie on Sanam Saeed at Cannes, Alia Bhatt Out of Frame? […]
she holds a UK passport.
Who? Sanam? She was born in London.
But both her parents are Pakistani and she was raised in Karachi. Her husband is also a Pakistani actor.
Anyway, Pakistan allows dual citizenship so not sure what your point is exactly.
I meant Alia bhatt
Oh OK.
But India doesn’t allow dual citizenship. So presumably she is working in India without being an Indian national?
Many do, for eg Deepika Padukone ,and earlier akshay khanna.
Is there any data on what percentage of Pakistani ‘elite’ have secondary citizenship or residency?
Anecdotally, it seems even the upper middle class try and shift their wealth to Dubai etc, London/US/Kanneda/Aus if they can – this includes the top tier jernails, but even the …ordinary elites like our very own resident self-proclaimed one, boast of their non-Pakistani kaagaz.
The clamor to leave Pakistan is almost universal amongst the educated in Pakistan. In India, this trend has started to shift, non-trivially. Almost my extended family cousins had opportunities to migrate to US/Canada/Aus. The ones who did were those with weaker education credentials, and are a minority.
I mean, the demographic here attests to that.
Not a single “Pakistani” Pakistani on this site.
And it’s not just the upper middle class.
Even lower class people are migrating, often illegally – some even engaging in prostitution.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awsh84Thb7c
There was a tragic story I remember reading in the Dawn a few years ago, of young Pakistani boys in Athens working in the flesh trade while awaiting asylum. This was before the recent round of ‘soft’ military takeover and I remember being shocked that such a story was actually getting covered.
very sad story..