Six years ago, I wrote an outraged post on BP when a British historian casually claimed that âthe British created Indiaâ (we had a very thriving commentariat then); a breathtaking erasure of one of the worldâs oldest civilizations.
Today, reading Francis Pikeâs piece in The Spectator, I feel the same cold disdain. Pike repeats the same old colonial fantasy: that India was a âpatchwork of principalities,â and that Nehru and Gandhi âinventedâ the myth of Indian unity. Letâs be clear: this is not history. Itâs imperial nostalgia dressed up as analysis.
âIndiaâs first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Mahatma Gandhi both propagated the myth that India had always been a unified country.â
âMore reflective commentators knew that this was hogwash.â
âIt was the British who⊠for the first time introduced the rule of law and a democratic form of government.â
This is colonial gaslighting at its most refined. Continue reading The Myth of the British-Made India



Aamina Ahmed is an expatriate Pakistani (born in the UK, currently teaches in the USA) who has written a novel set in the intersection of the Red Light area of Lahore and the rich and powerful of the state, around the time of Yahya Khan’s martial law. The story is well crafted and the book is well written and has a “message” about inequality, oppression, patriarchy and fascism, but unfortunately her lack of direct experience of Pakistan does show. The plot is more or less believable, but the details and dialogues are off. Anyone with some familiarity with the Punjab police and the way people actually talk or react in Lahore will feel that this is a foreigner writing about Pakistan. Certainly there are books written by foreigners that sound and feel very authentic (Memoirs of a geisha comes to mind), but unfortunately this is not one of those books. Part of the problem is not Aaminah Ahmed’s fault, as any writer in English has to deal with the fact that most of the dialog actually happens in Punjabi or Urdu, but her foreign-ness goes a little beyond that.