Venezuela is not being punished. It is being re-made. Not into a liberal democracy. Not into a stable autocracy. Into something more useful. Into a Pakistan. By this, I do not mean a people or a culture. I mean a regime form (as what Bush did to Maduro’s earlier Iraqi doppelgänger): a state kept permanently unstable, permanently securitised, and permanently dependent; yet intact enough to sign contracts, police its population, and function as leverage against rivals. This is the form Empire prefers when it can no longer rule directly.
1) Why Venezuela Matters
Venezuela is not peripheral. It is inconveniently rich.
-
The largest proven oil reserves in the world (over 300 billion barrels)
-
Significant natural gas
-
Large gold reserves
-
Access to rare earths
-
Control of the Caribbean–Atlantic corridor, close to major shipping lanes and the US mainland
A sovereign Venezuela is not a local problem. It is a potential pole. This is why it cannot be allowed to work. Donald Trump said the quiet part out loud: Venezuela has “all that oil.” It should be “ours.” The language was crude. The intent was orthodox. What matters is not the tone, but the continuity of aim.
2) Sanctions as a Weapon System
The process begins with attrition. You sanction a country for years (like Iran). You cut off refinancing. You block insurance, shipping, and payments. You crush the currency. You do it slowly, so it looks administrative rather than violent. Under that pressure, institutions decay. The army’s pay collapses. The civil service hollows out. The middle class leaves. At that point, protest becomes porous. Some anger is real. Some organisation is external. The distinction is meant to blur.
3) A Coup Without Tanks
Modern coups do not announce themselves. You do not need tanks in the street if you can induce structural obedience: a state that cannot stabilise its economy, cannot trust its security services, and cannot fund its own survival. When officers are unpaid and sanctions are permanent, betrayal stops being ideological. It becomes logistical. It becomes access to dollars. Economic warfare works because it turns loyalty into a luxury.
4) The Desired End State
The goal is not collapse. It is control without responsibility. A Pakistan-style Venezuela would have:
-
elections, but no monetary sovereignty
-
institutions, but no policy freedom
-
ministers, but no leverage
-
a flag, but no exit
The state survives. Governments rotate. But the country never escapes the box. It becomes governable only within limits set elsewhere. This is what “managed democracy” actually means.
5) Why Empire Prefers This Model
A Pakistan is useful. It is weak enough to pressure, strong enough to police. It generates crises on demand. It never becomes an example. A functioning, non-aligned, resource-sovereign Venezuela would be contagious across Latin America. A Venezuela trapped in permanent emergency inoculates the region against autonomy.
6) Trump Was Not the Aberration
There is a comforting fiction that this violence belongs to one man. Trump’s rhetoric was vulgar, not unique. He was a messenger with poor discipline. The policy predates him and will outlast him. Focusing on personality protects the system. The machinery does not care who speaks for it.
7) What the World Is Being Told
When this method becomes brazen, it is not just cruelty. It is communication. The message is: we can still do this. But the subtext may be darker: we have to do this. Secure empires rule quietly. They extract invisibly. They make domination feel like order. When they return to piracy, sanctions, seizures, spectacle, it often means the old tools are failing. Venezuela is not being turned into a warning by accident. It is being turned into a Pakistan by design.

I don’t understand the analogy with Pakistan.
Pakistan is a nuclear weapon state. No one would dream of seizing our leadership in the middle of the night. Many analysts have noted that this kind of thing cannot happen to a nuclear weapon state.
More importantly, what has happened in Venezuela is blatant colonialism. President Trump saying the US will “run” Venezuela and US oil companies will be involved shows that this is all about oil not about protecting the US from drugs or whatever rationale was being given. Arguably, Iraq was also all about oil and not about democracy or “weapons of mass destruction” or whatever we were told at the time.
This is a blatant violation of the UN charter. A country cannot go in and take out the head of state of another country for any reason. It’s ironic given that the US was the country that basically set up the post WWII rules-based order.
If the US can “run” Venezuela why can’t Russia “run” Ukraine?
The analogy makes no sense. Pakistan only has a surplus of Pakistanis. No global demand for the supply.
OBL ops vibes?
OBL was not the Pakistani head of state. The US didn’t conduct airstrikes on Islamabad. The President of the US didn’t say the US would “run” Pakistan.
I don’t think there was any need to bring up Pakistan when discussing Venezuela. Unless of course you just wanted to be provocative.
The US doesn’t need to seize Pakistani leadership – its all too willing to ‘bend the knee’ for a fistful of dollars.
Exact
It is smart of the Pakistani establishment to keep the world’s sole superpower on side. Especially when we need to establish deterrence against a larger enemy state that is bent upon playing the regional hegemon.
It is our alliances with China and the US that will keep India from attempting another “Operation Sindoor”.
Kabir: do you genuinely think Pakistan is a stable state with a productive long term trajectory ?
“but the ‘hegemony’.”
This is the new canard floated by PakMil to forestall peace with India. Now that the “Kashmir cause” has proven impossible to sustain. Its pathetically tragic how willing even educated Pakistanis are, to swallow such silly notions. The so-called India chooran is simply too effective.
Look, literally no country in South Asia likes India.
If it were only Pakistan, you might have a point. But literally every country in the neighborhood hates your bullying attitude. So perhaps introspect.
calm please – I removed the last line.
So it’s fine to say whatever nonsense about Pakistan but pointing out that India is not a superpower is somehow verboten?
Pakistan has a lot of problems. But that is no excuse for regime change.
The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a red line for any patriotic Pakistani.
The whole post WWII international system is based on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. Regime change is not meant to be an option ever. Clearly, this system is now coming apart.
Donald Trump said the quiet part out loud: Venezuela has “all that oil.” It should be “ours.
Like a said a few days back US is getting desperate to fix its debt problem. Venezuelans oil may red use it somewhat
Netamyahu meeting a few days before was no coincidence. Take away a reading partner of Iran. Russia was getting involved in the blockade. i.e. changing flags of oil tankers to Russia
The stance that India takes on the attacks on Venezuela will demonstrate how committed they are to the recognition of Sovereignty and independence of smaller asset rich states.
Does India feel that the USA and Japan will support them in the achievement of “Akhand Bharath”?
India is not the US. Pakistan (unlike Venezuela) has nuclear weapons. Thank God we have them, otherwise India could certainly contemplate regime change in Pakistan.
“Akhand Bharat” is a non-starter.
India will inevitably and inexorably expand its influence into so-called ‘Akhand Bharat’ as its economic rise continues.
Why in god’s name would it want anything to do with intentionally inviting headaches by attempting to re-draw borders? Let the Pakistanis, Afghans, Nepalis, Bangaldeshis, and the Lankans, continue their befuddled misrule internally. Those who collaborate and integrate economically with India, will benefit. Those who don’t will continue to fester.
The point (which you continue to miss as usual) is that even if India had any desire to indulge in regime change in Pakistan, you all are not capable of it. The US is the world’s sole superpower. India is nowhere near that. “Operation Sindoor” didn’t go particularly well for you.
Pakistan is a nuclear weapon state. Any attempt to indulge in regime change in Pakistan will bring those nuclear weapons into play.
The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a red line. Do not even think about testing us.
Btw: Afghanistan was never part of “India”. So your geography is also wrong.
where does this delusional strawman of India or Indians wanting “regime change” in Pakistan come from?
Besides, why should India even need to bother, when Pakistanis keep inflicting “regime change” amongst themselves from Sharif to Mush to Sharif to PakMil to Immy the Dim then back to Sharif. The circus is self-sustaining.
>Btw: Afghanistan was never part of “India”. So your geography is also wrong.
Where did I claim it was? You’re doing that thing again. Concocting strawmen, so you can obnoxiously knock them down.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1965137
The paranoid Pakistanis arrest a musician for singing a qawaali with political references. Kabir Miyaan, as a ‘musicologist’ do you have something to say about this?
First of all “Miyaan” is an offensive term. You know that very well as your Hindu Hriday Samrat used to refer to “Miyan Musharraf”. Don’t do that again.
Second of all why is musicologist in quotes? I have a degree in Ethnomusicology. I’ve published a book. All of this is in the public domain.
As for your question, the man should have known better than to sing a song which is a PTI campaign song or protest song. That will not fly at an event which was supposed to be non political.
There is zero tolerance for PTI in Punjab and any even slightly intelligent person would know that is the case.
so as a self-professed ‘center left liberal’ you think the arbitrary arrest of a singer for daring to sing a song with political references is …justified? You will be an apologist for such repressive, prima facie, illegal actions committed by Punjab police, because its ordered by the political party that you support? One that is explicitly neither centrist nor leftist?
And then you take umbrage when someone questions your assertions of being a “center left liberal”?
That sort of stance is…..a thing. I will refrain from commenting on the degree of intelligence it demonstrates.
PML-N is a centrist party. Look at Wikipedia.
Anyway you are really no one to give certificates on whether someone is center-left or not. You are a rando on the Internet who doesn’t even write under his real name.
This arrest is obviously overkill but there is zero tolerance for PTI in Punjab. This is simply a reality.
no need to provoke pls
The man lives to troll me and to troll Pakistan.
Be polite pls
I’m perfectly polite.
Do you not see his commenting record on Pakistan? He gets off on being provocative.
Even so – I’m having to edit your comments with particularly snarky lines (you people) etc
I’ll try not to be snarky.
But this should apply to RNJ as well. I am not going to take disrespect directed towards me lying down.
that is ur right but don’t extend it to “India that is Bharat”..
India & Pakistan are different entities; India is a 5,000 year old nation state that is only rivalled in age by China.. there is no other nation/place on Earth with such civilisational continuity.
Pakistan was essentially conjured in 1936 (at the earliest).
the two are not equivalent
I get a bit tired by how Pakistanis are so invested in “tit for tat” even for their own detriment
But you see this is the exact double standard. People can say nasty things about Pakistan and that seems to be OK with you but anything said about “India that is Bharat” causes the comment to be edited.
As I keep repeating over and over, both India and Pakistan are sovereign nation-states created on August 15, 1947. This is the academic consensus. As sovereign nation-states, both deserve exactly the same amount of respect.
Nasty comments about Pakistan on this forum serve no other purpose than to provoke the only Pakistani commenter.
Just as you get defensive when India is attacked, I will never tolerate Pakistan being slighted.
I do agree RNJ does seem to take a prurient interest in you + Pak..
I naturally will tend to orient global events back to a worldview.
I will expand on the Venezuela – Pakistan angle; unstable states being an anchor for postcolonial “Great Games.”
I wasn’t referring to you. I don’t think the analogy between Venezuela and Pakistan makes sense but it’s your blog.
But posts on Pakistan tend to bring out the anti Pakistan trolls. This is getting very tiresome.
never feed the trolls is a good mantra..
>>“Operation Sindoor” didn’t go particularly well for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB4KUCT8hro
Please try repeating it.
This time the US will not be on your side. China will make sure you learn a lesson you will never forget.
Incidentally, China’s foreign minister joined President Trump in revealing that China mediated the ceasefire.
“The World Is Not America’s Colony”
By Ahmad Ibsais
https://ahmadibsais.substack.com/p/the-world-is-not-americas-colony
“Jeffrey Sachs: U.S. Attacks Venezuela & Kidnaps President Maduro”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhZuTOuwKGA
maduro and his wife were followers of satya saibaba!!
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1215715810519186
a long cut and paste from jerry rao’s article in print. nice read.
https://theprint.in/opinion/venezuela-left-right-divide/2819840/
The racial-ethnic divide
So, in all this mess, what is the elephant in the room that no one wants to address? The supporters of Chávez and Maduro have largely come from the Venezuelan urban underclass, positioning themselves against the ricos. So, this whole thing can be analysed through the familiar Marxism lens of class conflict.
This class-based view, however, is limited. The Venezuelan ricos were and are not just wealthy. They are white Caucasians. They are descendants of Castilian aristocrats and, later, German and Italian migrants. By contrast, the majority of Venezuelans trace their ancestry back to Indigenous peoples, along with a smaller African component. They are most certainly not of white European origin.
Chávez was clearly of Indigenous descent. Maduro’s mother was from Colombia and was, in all probability, of mixed ancestry with a strong Indigenous component. Ignoring this racial and ethnic dimension reduces Venezuela’s crisis to economics alone and misses the point about power and identity in the country.
Now Maduro’s most well-known opponent, María Corina Machado—the recipient of a controversial Nobel Prize—is herself of almost entirely European descent, part Spanish and part Portuguese. She can be referred to as a wealthy Iberian aristocrat. Yet when debates are framed as contests between the ideological Left versus Right divide or clashes between the upper class and the underclass, the racial and ethnic divide is glossed over.
Unlike in North America, people of European descent are not an obvious majority in most of Latin America. With the possible exception of Argentina, the majority population in many countries is of Indigenous ancestry. Until the issue of a racial minority staying in charge of elite, powerful positions is confronted, political crises will continue. This is definitely the case with Colombia,Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia. Brazil has done a slightly better job in dealing with it. But then, only a “slightly” better job.
Chávez and Maduro are not just leftists working up their class base. They also represent a majority excluded from positions of power. This implies that even with the support of the regional or global hegemon, the ricos of Venezuela (Machado included) will not find it easy to assert control. The possibilities of dystopian civil wars cannot be excluded. That is perhaps why the US is not in any hurry to bring Machado into the picture, even if she and her supporters were confident about the same. The US may prefer to make a deal with the Chávez-Maduro followers, just with Maduro excluded. Time will tell.
Unlike in North America, people of European descent are not an obvious majority in most of Latin America.
Exactly