Venezuela as Pakistan: A Template, Not an Accident

Venezuela is not being punished. It is being re-made. Not into a liberal democracy. Not into a stable autocracy. Into something more useful. Into a Pakistan. By this, I do not mean a people or a culture. I mean a regime form (as what Bush did to Maduro’s earlier Iraqi doppelgänger): a state kept permanently unstable, permanently securitised, and permanently dependent; yet intact enough to sign contracts, police its population, and function as leverage against rivals. This is the form Empire prefers when it can no longer rule directly.

1) Why Venezuela Matters

Venezuela is not peripheral. It is inconveniently rich.

  • The largest proven oil reserves in the world (over 300 billion barrels)

  • Significant natural gas

  • Large gold reserves

  • Access to rare earths

  • Control of the Caribbean–Atlantic corridor, close to major shipping lanes and the US mainland

A sovereign Venezuela is not a local problem. It is a potential pole. This is why it cannot be allowed to work. Donald Trump said the quiet part out loud: Venezuela has “all that oil.” It should be “ours.” The language was crude. The intent was orthodox. What matters is not the tone, but the continuity of aim.

2) Sanctions as a Weapon System

The process begins with attrition. You sanction a country for years (like Iran). You cut off refinancing. You block insurance, shipping, and payments. You crush the currency. You do it slowly, so it looks administrative rather than violent. Under that pressure, institutions decay. The army’s pay collapses. The civil service hollows out. The middle class leaves. At that point, protest becomes porous. Some anger is real. Some organisation is external. The distinction is meant to blur.

3) A Coup Without Tanks

Modern coups do not announce themselves. You do not need tanks in the street if you can induce structural obedience: a state that cannot stabilise its economy, cannot trust its security services, and cannot fund its own survival. When officers are unpaid and sanctions are permanent, betrayal stops being ideological. It becomes logistical. It becomes access to dollars. Economic warfare works because it turns loyalty into a luxury.

4) The Desired End State

The goal is not collapse. It is control without responsibility. A Pakistan-style Venezuela would have:

  • elections, but no monetary sovereignty

  • institutions, but no policy freedom

  • ministers, but no leverage

  • a flag, but no exit

The state survives. Governments rotate. But the country never escapes the box. It becomes governable only within limits set elsewhere. This is what “managed democracy” actually means.

5) Why Empire Prefers This Model

A Pakistan is useful. It is weak enough to pressure, strong enough to police. It generates crises on demand. It never becomes an example. A functioning, non-aligned, resource-sovereign Venezuela would be contagious across Latin America. A Venezuela trapped in permanent emergency inoculates the region against autonomy.

6) Trump Was Not the Aberration

There is a comforting fiction that this violence belongs to one man. Trump’s rhetoric was vulgar, not unique. He was a messenger with poor discipline. The policy predates him and will outlast him. Focusing on personality protects the system. The machinery does not care who speaks for it.

7) What the World Is Being Told

When this method becomes brazen, it is not just cruelty. It is communication. The message is: we can still do this. But the subtext may be darker: we have to do this. Secure empires rule quietly. They extract invisibly. They make domination feel like order. When they return to piracy, sanctions, seizures, spectacle, it often means the old tools are failing. Venezuela is not being turned into a warning by accident. It is being turned into a Pakistan by design.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kabir
16 hours ago

I don’t understand the analogy with Pakistan.

Pakistan is a nuclear weapon state. No one would dream of seizing our leadership in the middle of the night. Many analysts have noted that this kind of thing cannot happen to a nuclear weapon state.

More importantly, what has happened in Venezuela is blatant colonialism. President Trump saying the US will “run” Venezuela and US oil companies will be involved shows that this is all about oil not about protecting the US from drugs or whatever rationale was being given. Arguably, Iraq was also all about oil and not about democracy or “weapons of mass destruction” or whatever we were told at the time.

This is a blatant violation of the UN charter. A country cannot go in and take out the head of state of another country for any reason. It’s ironic given that the US was the country that basically set up the post WWII rules-based order.

If the US can “run” Venezuela why can’t Russia “run” Ukraine?

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 hours ago
Reply to  Kabir

The analogy makes no sense. Pakistan only has a surplus of Pakistanis. No global demand for the supply.

Kabir
10 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

OBL was not the Pakistani head of state. The US didn’t conduct airstrikes on Islamabad. The President of the US didn’t say the US would “run” Pakistan.

I don’t think there was any need to bring up Pakistan when discussing Venezuela. Unless of course you just wanted to be provocative.

RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
9 hours ago
Reply to  Kabir

The US doesn’t need to seize Pakistani leadership – its all too willing to ‘bend the knee’ for a fistful of dollars.

Kabir
4 hours ago
Reply to  X.T.M

It is smart of the Pakistani establishment to keep the world’s sole superpower on side. Especially when we need to establish deterrence against a larger enemy state that is bent upon playing the regional hegemon.

It is our alliances with China and the US that will keep India from attempting another “Operation Sindoor”.

RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
1 hour ago
Reply to  X.T.M

“but the ‘hegemony’.”

This is the new canard floated by PakMil to forestall peace with India. Now that the “Kashmir cause” has proven impossible to sustain. Its pathetically tragic how willing even educated Pakistanis are, to swallow such silly notions. The so-called India chooran is simply too effective.

Kabir
8 minutes ago

Look, literally no country in South Asia likes India.

If it were only Pakistan, you might have a point. But literally every country in the neighborhood hates your bullying attitude. So perhaps introspect.

India should not try to be a superpower. You people are way below the league of the US or even China.

Kabir
10 minutes ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Pakistan has a lot of problems. But that is no excuse for regime change.

The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a red line for any patriotic Pakistani.

The whole post WWII international system is based on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. Regime change is not meant to be an option ever. Clearly, this system is now coming apart.

sbarrkum
sbarrkum
12 hours ago

Donald Trump said the quiet part out loud: Venezuela has “all that oil.” It should be “ours.
Like a said a few days back US is getting desperate to fix its debt problem. Venezuelans oil may red use it somewhat

Netamyahu meeting a few days before was no coincidence. Take away a reading partner of Iran. Russia was getting involved in the blockade. i.e. changing flags of oil tankers to Russia

sbarrkum
sbarrkum
10 hours ago

The stance that India takes on the attacks on Venezuela will demonstrate how committed they are to the recognition of Sovereignty and independence of smaller asset rich states.
Does India feel that the USA and Japan will support them in the achievement of “Akhand Bharath”?

Kabir
10 hours ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

India is not the US. Pakistan (unlike Venezuela) has nuclear weapons. Thank God we have them, otherwise India could certainly contemplate regime change in Pakistan.

“Akhand Bharat” is a non-starter.

Last edited 10 hours ago by Kabir
RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
9 hours ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

India will inevitably and inexorably expand its influence into so-called ‘Akhand Bharat’ as its economic rise continues.

Why in god’s name would it want anything to do with intentionally inviting headaches by attempting to re-draw borders? Let the Pakistanis, Afghans, Nepalis, Bangaldeshis, and the Lankans, continue their befuddled misrule internally. Those who collaborate and integrate economically with India, will benefit. Those who don’t will continue to fester.

Kabir
6 hours ago

The point (which you continue to miss as usual) is that even if India had any desire to indulge in regime change in Pakistan, you all are not capable of it. The US is the world’s sole superpower. India is nowhere near that. “Operation Sindoor” didn’t go particularly well for you.

Pakistan is a nuclear weapon state. Any attempt to indulge in regime change in Pakistan will bring those nuclear weapons into play.

The sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a red line. Do not even think about testing us.

Btw: Afghanistan was never part of “India”. So your geography is also wrong.

RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
1 hour ago
Reply to  Kabir

where does this delusional strawman of India or Indians wanting “regime change” in Pakistan come from?

Besides, why should India even need to bother, when Pakistanis keep inflicting “regime change” amongst themselves from Sharif to Mush to Sharif to PakMil to Immy the Dim then back to Sharif. The circus is self-sustaining.

>Btw: Afghanistan was never part of “India”. So your geography is also wrong.

Where did I claim it was? You’re doing that thing again. Concocting strawmen, so you can obnoxiously knock them down.

Last edited 1 hour ago by RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
1 hour ago

https://www.dawn.com/news/1965137

The paranoid Pakistanis arrest a musician for singing a qawaali with political references. Kabir Miyaan, as a ‘musicologist’ do you have something to say about this?

Kabir
14 minutes ago

First of all “Miyaan” is an offensive term. You know that very well as your Hindu Hriday Samrat used to refer to “Miyan Musharraf”. Don’t do that again.

Second of all why is musicologist in quotes? I have a degree in Ethnomusicology. I’ve published a book. All of this is in the public domain.

As for your question, the man should have known better than to sing a song which is a PTI campaign song or protest song. That will not fly at an event which was supposed to be non political.

There is zero tolerance for PTI in Punjab and any even slightly intelligent person would know that is the case.

Last edited 4 minutes ago by Kabir
Kabir
10 hours ago

“The World Is Not America’s Colony”

By Ahmad Ibsais

https://ahmadibsais.substack.com/p/the-world-is-not-americas-colony

Kabir
6 hours ago

“Jeffrey Sachs: U.S. Attacks Venezuela & Kidnaps President Maduro”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhZuTOuwKGA

Brown Pundits
21
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x