She Parked a Car With Her Husband. Fifty Years Later, She Is Still Waiting.

Before anything about this blog, its standards, or its arguments, I want to begin with a story;Β because sometimes a single human life cuts through every debate and reminds us what any of this is actually for.

Damayanti Tambay was 21 years old, a three-time national badminton champion, when she married Flight Lieutenant Vijay Tambay in April 1970. Twenty months later, war broke out. On 3 December 1971, they drove together to a garage in Ambala cantonment to park their bottle-green Fiat. That was the last time she saw him.

On 5 December, flying a strike mission over Shorkot Airbase in West Pakistan, Vijay was hit by anti-aircraft fire and ejected. Radio Pakistan later broadcast his name among those captured. Damayanti heard it alone. She felt relief. A prisoner of war comes home eventually, she thought.

He never did.

A Loving Wife’s Unending Search

She retired from badminton at the peak of her career and spent the next fifty years petitioning prime ministers, defence ministers, army officials; anyone who would listen. In 1989, Vijay’s uncle was taken to a prison in Faisalabad and shown a cell. Inside sat a bearded man in a white kurta, reading a newspaper. He recognised him instantly. He was pulled away before either of them could speak. Damayanti is still looking. She no longer expects him to return. She is looking for closure.

β€œFor me, he was everything and vice versa. If I don’t look out for him, who will?” There are still 54 Indian defence personnel officially unaccounted for after 1971. That fact is not a talking point. It is not a nationalist weapon. It is not an argument to win. It is a moral wound that has not healed.

What is Wrong is Wrong

What was done to Vijay Tambay, and what has been denied to Damayanti for five decades, is not abstract. It does not belong to India or Pakistan as debating positions. It belongs to the category of wrong.

The deepest strands of every serious moral tradition, religious or secular, insist on one principle before all others: the human being cannot be reduced to an instrument of the state. Not to be traded, not to be erased, not to be forgotten because acknowledgement is inconvenient.

Humanity First. That Is What the Divine Asks of Us.

This blog has lately drifted into abstraction; vocabulary, terminology, identity, provocation, counter-provocation. Those discussions matter. Language shapes memory. History shapes politics. But beneath every identity any of us carries, Indian, Pakistani, AASI, diasporic, nationalist, secular, there is a more fundamental layer of moral reality. A woman parked a car with her husband and never saw him again.

If we cannot begin there, if we cannot agree that this is simply, plainly wrong, then no moderation policy, no pledge, no appeal to high signal will repair anything. Before we argue about civilisation, religion, nationalism, or pride, we must recover something more basic: the refusal to let a human life become collateral in rhetoric. Call it simple decency. But start there. Humanity first.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

69 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bombay Badshah
1 month ago

And we returned the 93000.

That is the difference between the two countries.

That is why there can be no equivalence

Even in Kargil, the Pakistani dead were returned.

sbarrkum
1 month ago

Before we argue about civilisation, religion, nationalism, or pride, we must recover something more basic: the refusal to let a human life become collateral in rhetoric. Call it simple decency. But start there.
ο»Ώ
No difference to what happens to many Palestinian Civilians. They languish in Israeli Jails

Dozens of Palestinian prisoners have died in Israeli prisons over the past two and a half years, some during torture while others as a result of medical neglect by prison authorities, rights groups say.

What kind of decency do the Zionist have

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/2/17/after-dozens-died-in-israeli-jails-death-penalty-law-rattles-palestinians

Last edited 1 month ago by sbarrkum
sbarrkum
1 month ago

.

sbarrkum
1 month ago

Officially recorded by the Indian Air Force as killed in action,Tambay is believed to be one of the five pilots reported by the Pakistan Observer to have been captured alive on 5 December 1971

So a lot of hearsay.
The Indian govt DOES NOT claim held by Pakistan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijay_Vasant_Tambay#cite_note-Tribune-5

sbarrkum
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

So where are the remains if he has been KIA?
but Pakistan must also own up

The GOVERNMENT of INDIA has no Issue.
What is your Issue XTM.

This just a verbatim rehash of Indian Tabloid News Channel.
High Signal I guess, Sad

sbarrkum
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

So your post was in the purpose of “World Peace” and Reconciliation

sbarrkum
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

So how does verbatim rehash of Indian Tabloid News Channel.serve Humanity.
Even the Indian Govt has not pursued the matter for years

sbarrkum
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

is the government the arbiter of morality

Not my fight
Muslim versus Muslim
Iranian origin Shia versus Sunni Pakistan
Is not Allah the the God of your Prophet

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

I’m not Sunni πŸ™‚

sbarrkum
1 month ago
Reply to  Kabir

Kabir I know you are not Sunni.

XTM Is attacking Pakistan
More like sowing dissension.
Sneakily I may add, I dont like sneakiness.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  sbarrkum

I wouldn’t say he’s “attacking Pakistan”.

I think this article is unbalanced.

I feel that sometimes in the interests of balance, a “pro-Pakistan” article is followed by an “anti-Pakistan” article– this is obviously a simplification but there’s some truth to it.

He tries to take a middle ground and no one is happy–neither RNJ nor myself.

Anyway, I’ve made my point. I don’t think there needs to be that much more discourse about this.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Yes, I gather he didn’t want to take the pledge.

RecoveringNewsJunkie
RecoveringNewsJunkie
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Its not about ‘taking or not taking’ pledges. Even without the pledge, my posting (and comments) hardly needed moderation, if ever.

I think there is a non-trivial difference between the content and contribution that I made, vs …the other 3 I was incorrectly bracketed with.

Kabir
1 month ago

Any honest person would have to admit that the constant use of “Nazis” “kleptocratic” and “genocide” was gratuitous and needlessly hurtful to Pakistani sentiments. Not to mention insulting the Field Marshal as “failed marshal”. That’s completely uncalled for.

If such language cannot be used about India than it certainly cannot be used about Pakistan.

I get that you are not very good at introspecting, but you have engaged in some extremely trollish behavior when it comes to Pakistan.

Anyway, the rule was that all four of us had to take the pledge in order to be “authors”. That’s not a rule I came up with and it should be consistently applied to all.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I’m happy to not “rehash” old stuff. However, when RNJ pretends that he hasn’t engaged in trollish behavior, that needs to be called out. Many of his comments were made primarily to trigger Pakistanis. Making posts about the secession of Balochistan was extremely below the belt.

I don’t really care whether he is an “author” or not but he can’t become one without taking the pledge.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Definitely “high signal low noise”.

Banning the use of needlessly provocative language was a good step.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago

In other news, Pakistan has abandoned the soldiers captured by the BLA and said the video is AI.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M
Last edited 1 month ago by Bombay Badshah
Kabir
1 month ago

I don’t agree with how aggressive Sbarr is being about this.

However, it is true that this post comes across as a bit one-sided. This is obviously a tragic story but there was no attempt to balance it with stories of Pakistani women whose husbands are languishing in Indian jails.

Even in Occupied Kashmir, one can find many examples of “half-widows”–women whose husbands have been disappeared by Indian security forces and they have no idea if they are alive or dead.

Anyway, I agree with your high-level conclusion that a human being cannot be reduced to an instrument of the state.

The way this post was framed makes it seem like this is particularly a Pakistani problem and India doesn’t do the same.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

It wasn’t meant to be “whataboutism”. I’m simply saying that this post comes across as one-sided.

I thought a lot about even commenting on this. Initially, I was just going to ignore it. But then I realized that the problem I had with it was that it seems to single out Pakistan.

Anyway, I don’t really feel like getting into a long debate on this.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I think what Sbarr and I are expressing (in our different ways) is that the post seems to single out Pakistan. It comes across as unbalanced.

I’m not aware of the details of the specific case mentioned. Sbarr says that Tambay was killed in action. Regardless, it’s a tragic story.

I’m not trying to be “hyper nationalistic”. I suppose I’m just sensitive to anti-Pakistan bias. I love my country.

In the end, it’s your judgement call.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  Kabir

Oh please, occupied Balochistan is degrees worse.

The number of missing there is humongous.

Mahrang Baloch rings any bells?

Kashmir is at peace now.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

“Occupied Balochistan”– I think you have very little understanding of international law.

Kashmir is internationally recognized as Disputed Territory. The LOC is a ceasefire line not a border. Every country on earth refers to “Indian-Administered” and “Pakistani-Administered” Kashmir. The only country that thinks Kashmir is part of India is India.

Balochistan is unequivocally part of Pakistan and is recognized as such by every country on earth.

The two are not the same.

The sovereignty and territorial integrity of Pakistan are absolute red lines.

Feel free to have the last word. This is getting incredibly repetitive now.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  Kabir

“Administered”, not “occupied”

Pakistani Kashmir is as “occupied” by international law.

And Bangladesh was also “unequivocally” part of Pakistan.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Before demographic change. Pakistan never had an article 370.

Pakistan Kashmir is barely “Kashmiri”.

Anyways plebiscite is moot. It will be the international border someday.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Exactly. Azad Kashmir has its own President and Prime Minister.

It is technically not part of Pakistan. According to the Pakistani constitution, Pakistan is the four provinces (KPK, Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan). AJK and GB are self-governing areas pending the resolution of the Kashmir Dispute.

In practice, however, a lot of AJK’s affairs are directly controlled from Islamabad.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Only in name.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

The point is that Pakistan has not annexed our part of Kashmir. AJK and GB are not constitutionally parts of Pakistan.

India in contrast has removed Article 370 (the basis on which the Dogra Maharaja “acceded” to India) and divided the state of J&K into two union territories.

Azad Kashmir even has its own national anthem: “Watan Hamara Azad Kashmir”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b2MWR-gGPk

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

I think it is very telling that the one time in Indian history that a fully-fledged state was demoted to a union territory it happened to be the only Muslim-majority state.

Can you imagine Tamil Nadu being unilaterally divided into union territories?

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Not a “Muslim nationalist” but a Pakistani nationalist. I am a patriotic Pakistani and there’s nothing wrong with that.

When it comes to Indian politics, I of course prefer Congress to the BJP. I believe firmly in Nehruvian Secularism and am against Hindutva.

Bombay Badshah
1 month ago
Reply to  Kabir

Paksitani Nationalist is Muslim Nationalist/Islamist considering the foundation of the state.

To be secular is to undermine the very existence of Pakistan.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

You clearly don’t know what “Islamist” means. It is someone who advocates for shariah law.

The mainstream parties in Pakistan (PML-N, PPP etc) do not advocate for shariah law. Jamaat-e-Islami does. But JeI gets a very small percentage of the vote.

Pakistani nationalism is based on the “Two Nation Theory”. It’s not inherently “Islamist”.

I find it interesting that you are so against Pakistani nationalism when the BJP is bent on making India into a “Hindu Pakistan”.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  Bombay Badshah

The international community uses “Administered” for both sides of Kashmir.

Pakistan’s official wording is “India-Occupied Kashmir” or “India-held Kashmir”. Just as India’s official wording is “POK” (which I find just as offensive as you find “Occupied” Kashmir).

I’m Pakistani. My position is that India is Occupying Kashmir.

East Pakistan was unequivocally part of Pakistan. India had no right to break Pakistan. That is precisely why we have nuclear arms today. Not an inch of the Islamic Republic will go anywhere.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

It’s not “jingoistic” to note that the article is unbalanced.

Ask yourself if you would have posted an article like this where India was the villain and not contextualized it at all by noting that Pakistan does similar things.

To a Pakistani, this comes off as anti-Pakistan.

Anyway, that’s a subjective POV. I don’t want to keep belaboring this.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Is it your contention that Pakistan is uniquely evil when it comes to things like this?

We’ll have to agree to disagree. My considered opinion is that this post–as it is currently framed–is anti-Pakistan.

Kabir
1 month ago
Reply to  X.T.M

Opinions are subjective and cannot be right or wrong.

I’m perhaps oversensitive to anti-Pakistan bias.

But I do believe that you would not make a post like this singling out India as the villain of the piece and not contextualizing it.

Perhaps I’ll be proved wrong someday.

Brown Pundits
69
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x