What Iran means to Kashmir| War, identity, & 5000 years of history| The Kashmir Notebook Ep 12

In this episode of The Kashmir Notebook, Gowhar Geelani is in conversation with Professor Noor Ahmed Baba, a noted political scientist and IR expert, to explore the historical, cultural, and political connections between Kashmir and Iran. Why is Kashmir often referred to as “Iran-e-Saghir” (Little Iran)? What explains the strong emotional response in Kashmir to the ongoing conflict in West Asia? Professor Baba traces these connections back nearly 5,000 years—through ancient migrations, Central Asian linkages, the influence of the Sassanid Empire, and the gradual spread of Islam shaped by Persian cultural traditions. The conversation also moves to the present geopolitical moment. As tensions escalate in West Asia, Professor Baba analyses the implications of the Iran conflict for global power structures, the Strait of Hormuz and energy security, and the shifting balance from a unipolar to a multipolar world. He reflects on the roles of the United States, Israel, China, and Russia, and discusses what these changes could mean for South Asia, particularly India and Pakistan.

Published by

Kabir

I am Pakistani-American. I am a Hindustani classical vocalist and ethnomusicologist. I hold a B.A from George Washington University (Dramatic Literature, Western Music) and an M.Mus (Ethnomusicology) from SOAS, University of London. My dissertation “A New Explanation for the Decline of Hindustani Music in Pakistan” has recently been published by Aks Publications (Lahore 2024). Samples of my singing can be heard on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/artist/0Le1RnQQJUeKkkXj5UCKfB

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pandit Brown
Pandit Brown
2 minutes ago

Haven’t seen the YouTube video, but the screenshot visible on this page has a quote “Kashmir was under Iran’s Sassanid Empire”. Unless he has a different definition of “under”, that never happened. I’m sure they had “ties” of some kind, but then their contemporaries in southern India had ties with the Roman Empire too; that does not imply any kind of imperial or vassal relationship.

Not sure what the purpose of all this is. It’s not like the Sassanids were even Muslim, assuming this is an effort to burnish Kashmir’s Muslim credentials (in fact, the Sassanids were defeated and conquered by the early Muslims).

Brown Pundits
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x