Dear friends,
I just wanted to share a thought that’s been on my mind lately. Yes, Trump has attacked Iran — but Iran hasn’t responded in any major way. That in itself is telling. It seems less a climax than a provocation, more bait than strategy. In truth, this might be part of a larger Western pattern: in its long twilight, the West no longer seeks peace but relevance — and sometimes, relevance requires war.
I recently heard a wild claim: that Norway was positioning a remote island of 150 people to tempt a Russian invasion, hoping to activate NATO’s mutual defence clause. Whether true or not, it captures something of the moment — the performative anxiety of a declining order, looking for conflict to reaffirm its own centrality.
As Amar writes, “It is heart-wrenching to see Iran being bombed by two nuclear states, while it remains a signatory to the NPT and compliant with IAEA inspections.” He recalls living in Tehran in 1980, a schoolboy witnessing warplanes above Mehrabad and the skies of Tehran blazing with anti-aircraft fire. That memory isn’t abstract — it’s personal, etched in smoke. His excellent comment is after the jump:

Amar’s critique is sobering:
“This is the first time that two nuclear-armed countries have attacked a non-nuclear state. It shows the NPT has no teeth — just a tool of power. Even the UN Secretary General has called the U.S. attack a violation of the UN Charter.”
He adds that “Iran will perhaps now withdraw from the NPT and look to North Korea as the model: a nuclearized state, untouchable.” That, too, is part of the tragedy — a world in which the logic of restraint leads only to punishment, and the logic of power offers the only security.
Historically, the West has never been more powerful than in the mid-19th century. Today, it is powerful still — but no longer alone. From the Franco-Prussian War in 1871 to the colonial crises of the 20th century, its story has been one of wars that cost it much more than it gained. The wars of memory have now become wars of meaning — to prove that Western power still matters, still shapes the map, still draws the red line.
But history has moved on. The 21st century will not be decided by who bombed first, but by who builds next.
Warmly,
Zack

when one talks of west this or west that, we need to first ask, when was this not the case. Using big stick to beat others, using stones to beat others. That is how ancient this need for dominance has been. Iran was seeking nuclear weapons, 60% enrichment when 3-5% enrichment is enough for nuclear fuel was already evidence that it seeks weapons. No need for them to go that far. Pak did not develop nuclear weapons, it was given nuclear weapons by china. Hence India was warned not to take action against pak nuclear sites, because they already had weapons given to them by china in late 80’s. north korea got nukes from pak. Both pak and north korea were given nukes by china to offshore their security concerns by providing these rogue states with weapons to keep its neighbors unsteady and engaged. So, your idea is just wrong. Iran wont get nukes anytime soon unless other country gives them nukes, china /russia?
interesting comment – I don’t think China wants a nuclear Iran..
There is a new method to enrich uranium, the technology is not yet there but getting there soon. I am not telling how, For next 10 yrs atleast, no nukes for iran.
I absolutely agree no nukes for Iran..
Philosophically, If Israel can be allowed to have nukes on what moral basis can Iran be forbidden from having them?
medvedev says this exactly, says there are countries interested in giving nukes to iran. enrichment by iran will continue, also, trump by his antics revealed his plan, so iran removed its 60% enriched uranium and kept it safe elsewhere, if so, the whole operation was a failure.
My opinion is that Iran should have nukes, otherwise they will have the same fate as Libya and Iraq
However some western commentators think
That does mean, and does not make it more likely, that Iran will start to produce nuclear weapons. There are principle, religiously bound reasons why it has so far refrained from doing so. Those have not changed.
——-
The Trump bombing of Iranian Nuclear sites and the Iranian “Retaliation” were both Scripted to keep Netanyahu and AIPAC happy.
Just like Trumps scripted retaliation for Iranian capturing a Reaper drone a few years back
Meanwhile
Iranian FM Clarifies That If Israel Holds Fire, So will Iran: Fighting ‘Until The Very Last Minute’
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/white-house-press-secretary-hints-iran-regime-change-claims-intel-said-weeks-nuclear
My opinion is that Iran should get nukes otherwise the fate of Libya and Iraq.
That does mean, and does not make it more likely, that Iran will start to produce nuclear weapons. There are principle and religiously bound reasons why it has so far refrained from doing so. Those have not changed
———
The Trump bombing of Iranian Nuclear sites and the Iranian “Retaliation” were both Scripted to keep Netanyahu and AIPAC happy.
Just like Trumps scripted retaliation for Iranian capturing a Reaper drone a few years back
Meanwhile
Iranian FM Clarifies That If Israel Holds Fire, So will Iran: Fighting ‘Until The Very Last Minute’
I never thought I would agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene (a right-wing nutjob) but I do agree with her statement on US strikes on Iran:
“Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war. There would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first. Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer.”
Trump was elected partly on the promise to end American involvement in “forever wars” in the Middle East. But it seems he has turned out to be yet another neocon. I don’t think a Kamala Harris administration would have bombed Iran. Although, one can’t say for sure since the US alliance with Israel has bipartisan support.
yes MAGA is p!ssed..
I was thinking about Kamala and I agree with you on that and with MTG
In agreement with Ammar’s comment. Agree on the increased irrelevance of the West, but they’ve left a trail of destruction over decades in the Middle East, with the latest casualty being Iran. They have the comfort of geographical isolation, with the rest of us being left to pick the pieces of a traumatized continent.
I’ve been so disturbed by how the bullies picked on a sovereign country and bombed it with impunity breaking all international norms. Will China now care two hoots about any international opinion when it invades Taiwan?
The hypocrisy couldn’t be more stark with their moral posturing. I never thought I’d agree with Kabir on this, but yes, nuclear deterrence is the only thing that works against the big, bad Western bullies.
“Defending Iran is Asia’s Existential Imperative” by Farwa Sial
https://thewire.in/world/defending-iran-is-asias-existential-imperative
“If You Are Cheering for Bombs on Muslim Lands, You are Not a ‘Nationalist'” by Pawan Khera (chairman of media and communications for the Congress party)
https://thewire.in/communalism/iran-strikes-us-israel-palestine-gaza-india
random thoughts not in any order.
i) shia persian iran had no business to get involved in a ‘jati jaghada’, jews were having with sunni arabs. this was political choice ayatollahs took and are paying the price.
ii) iran had attacked american bases in qatar, baharain, iraq and syria after informing the arab govts. some sort of show khusti, iranians are famous for.
iii) a(o)rnab has managed to get p m l (n) ans p t i fight on his show.!!!
iv) america will not let go middle east.
v) packistan??? dexterous like a ballet dancer and going in circles like a kathak dancer. seriously, their policies will be studied as a typical case in political science classes.
vii) china???
trump and Israel dropped the ball it seems on making sure, the enriched uranium was not used or hidden elsewhere . Netanyahu seems to have valued himself above everything. Not good.
Yes disaster for Bibi
Complicated relationship and how things came to be…interesting article:
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/how-iran-us-and-israel-closest-ally-in-the-middle-east-became-their-bitterest-enemy-8741314?pfrom=home-ndtv_premium