Kabirâs Muslim nationalism cosplaying as liberalism is vexatious (it would be excellent if he just disclosed his priors), but I give the admin full authority to handle that directly.
My immediate concern is with BB-HS. I have barred him from becoming an author and have removed his last twenty comments. Despite his earlier misrepresentation about being âhalf-Muslim,â I allowed him to return under a new handle, tabula rasa. His output, however, is increasingly defined by âfantasiesâ about what a model minority should be; deracinated and devoid of meaningful character.
BBâs Response (after I had deleted his past 20 comments)
âWhy though? The only animus I have is with Kabir because he represents a demographic I loathe â The soft Islamist | The âliberalâ English-speaking version who whitewashes his more hardcore cousinsâ atrocities. Actual people have died due to Islamists which Kabir downplays (Pahalgam, October 7th). Some ribbing online is nothing in comparison. And I havenât even said anything insulting.â
My Response
-
- Kabir is not an Islamist. He is a Muslim nationalistâsince Pakistan itself is sine qua non Muslim nationalism (the idea that Indian Muslims were entitled to their own nation). Just as every Israeli is, by definition, a Zionist/Jewish nationalist, even if individuals disagree with its implications, Kabir represents that current.
- What stands out is that BB mentions only Pahalgam and October 7âboth undeniably tragic events, and I say this as someone who is not Muslimâwhile omitting the ongoing genocide in Gaza.It is akin to referencing 9/11, a devastating moment in history, without also acknowledging the destruction of Afghanistan and Iraq and the millions of lives lost in their aftermath.
- Unlike Kabir, vexatious, but rarely personal, BB makes his attacks direct. He is not Kabirâs friend indulging in ribbing; he is simply âHoneyâ under another guise.
- What sets him apart is an openly hierarchical stance: non-Muslim lives ranked above Muslim ones, echoing the very post-colonial divide-and-rule strategies we are meant to reject.
- Kabir manipulates through weaponised victimhood; BB chooses blunt hostility, lacing personal abuse into his commentary. I have permanently removed Honeyâs comments for that reason, vulgarity leaves no space for debate and I treat BB and Honey as a single entity.
- Beneath the very different styles of BB-HS & Kabir lies the same contempt: the belief that the only acceptable minority is one hollowed out, compliant, and dead on the inside.
Moderation Philosophy
As a Founder, my job is to ensure Brown Pundits does not become an echo chamber. I have repeatedly critiqued Kabirâs contradictions, but once I accepted him as a Muslim nationalist cosplaying liberalism, I could also accept his place in the debate. We have multiple Hindu nationalists here, and when Kabir is challenged\moderated, the balance tends to restore itself. The ecosystem can correct for his presence.
Finally, let me stress: the comment boards are not the only heart of this site. Too often they descend into noise. If regular commentators want to influence debate constructively, they should apply to become Authors; where they can speak directly to our 2,000+ daily readers, not just the dozen or so regular commentariat.
Brown Pundits is rapidly emerging as the most interesting Indo-Pak cross-channel precisely because it is not an echo chamber. We literally upset everyone and that is a great thing because it means we are covering new difficult terrain. My moderation began with strict principles, but like everyone else, I have a life, job, and family. That means I must also be pragmatic.
